depending on how complicated you wanted to make it...
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 18/06/2010 01:30:37 PM
you could perhaps even have it make some sort of will or concentration check to NOT be distracted by the person on its back. You'd probably have to make it a harder check to not be distracted so much by it that it had an AC loss to the surrounding party members, but still remain "distracted" enough to not lose as much AC to the person on its back.
For that matter, it'd probably lose a substantial amount of AC to the person on its back. Provided they can stay on well enough to attack, they're in a very good position to do serious damage.
Hmm come to think of it, I can see why his DM refused to field the action you could really make it QUITE complicated without trying very hard... Still, creativity like this should never be squashed.
For that matter, it'd probably lose a substantial amount of AC to the person on its back. Provided they can stay on well enough to attack, they're in a very good position to do serious damage.
Hmm come to think of it, I can see why his DM refused to field the action you could really make it QUITE complicated without trying very hard... Still, creativity like this should never be squashed.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Riding a hostile creature
15/06/2010 09:58:07 PM
- 642 Views
Your DM was being a dick.
16/06/2010 02:08:17 AM
- 588 Views
And if you are playing 4th ed, which kicks 3.5's ass ( ), then you'd do something similar.
16/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
- 542 Views
mm. two things that bother me about 4th edition
17/06/2010 05:16:07 AM
- 533 Views
Yep.
18/06/2010 12:28:08 AM
- 477 Views
I don't much mind 4th edition, wasn't trying to make a big argument
18/06/2010 01:09:01 PM
- 522 Views
Also: I'm confused by what you mean when you say "core" classes.
18/06/2010 04:26:59 AM
- 477 Views
I'm talking about the classes which DnD has always associated with as "Core"
18/06/2010 01:27:27 PM
- 528 Views
Those ARE all in the Player's Handbook 1.
18/06/2010 06:16:45 PM
- 503 Views
Yah, I was just signing on to say that they seem to have fixed that
19/06/2010 06:07:43 AM
- 545 Views
Well... 3rd edition had about a million books. So that's not exactly a new trend *NM*
19/06/2010 03:56:20 PM
- 216 Views
Agreed. Ihaven't DM'd since 2nd edition, but :
18/06/2010 09:25:41 AM
- 565 Views
depending on how complicated you wanted to make it...
18/06/2010 01:30:37 PM
- 516 Views
Indeed. The number 1 rule for any DM: never say no. If a player wants to do something, let them try.
18/06/2010 06:31:20 PM
- 516 Views