A computer I had before this one was made in 2003, and could definitely not play most modern games. It could barely run Oblivion on the lowest settings. But even in the rural area where my parents lived, a place where cable tv was a recent invention, there was internet. And all you need to authenticate a game is a connection, it doesn't have to be a good one.
The desktop I'm using now is 5 years old. It struggles through some of the very intensive games out there today, but with small changes (upgrading my RAM and video card - cost me under $100) it runs much better.
Oh, I agree that you can get a data connection pretty much anywhere in the world these days, given all the satellites. However, cost is another issue and the predominant barrier to access these days.
I live in Canada. Perhaps that skews my internet availability perception? I don't know. It seems that most places where gaming is big enough to have a market are going to have internet connections.
I don't know - I lived in Calgary for about 8 months and I remember that broadband plans were not all unlimited access - most seemed to have a cap. Is that different these days? The cost was not much more expensive compared to plans in the US for example, but definitely cheaper than in Europe.
The other thing is, we tend to take internet pretty much for granted as a living expense. But for most people, broadband is still fairly expensive - the cheapest plans in the US run around $30/month, but it's more expensive pretty much everywhere else in the world (by cost of living standards at least). Even in Mumbai, India pretty crappy service converts to about $30/month, which is much, much more expensive in cost-of-living terms.
There are still people who like to play video games for the single player aspect and would rather not pay for an internet connection.
Starcraft II won't have crazy DRM.
28/05/2010 01:59:14 PM
- 859 Views
Could be worse. I'm still miffed about its release structure, though. I feel milked.
28/05/2010 03:01:54 PM
- 529 Views
Still a load of shit.
28/05/2010 06:39:46 PM
- 525 Views
I'm pretty anti-DRM, but one-time connection seems reasonable enough.
28/05/2010 07:03:24 PM
- 464 Views
Don't get so excited, sheesh.
28/05/2010 11:04:47 PM
- 533 Views
Go start your own game company? Really? That's the only response?
08/06/2010 03:49:33 AM
- 497 Views
Even just a single authentication?
08/06/2010 05:00:38 AM
- 465 Views
Will they?
08/06/2010 06:50:01 PM
- 475 Views
Re: Will they?
09/06/2010 12:06:38 AM
- 423 Views
If you think DRM will stop pirating...it wont
09/06/2010 12:21:03 AM
- 461 Views
Your posts are like the lovechild of a video game fanboy and a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.
09/06/2010 03:05:34 AM
- 521 Views
Re: Your posts are like the lovechild of a video game fanboy and a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.
09/06/2010 02:18:17 PM
- 458 Views
I have to agree... the more restrictions and hassles they put on playing purchased games
09/06/2010 05:37:40 AM
- 431 Views
Who doesn't have the internet these days?
09/06/2010 06:08:19 AM
- 466 Views
The majority of people, actually.
09/06/2010 06:27:30 AM
- 476 Views
Re: The majority of people, actually.
09/06/2010 06:53:30 AM
- 488 Views
Re: The majority of people, actually.
09/06/2010 06:41:28 PM
- 419 Views
That's just a terrible argument. If they have no Internet, they can't illegally download games.
10/06/2010 02:18:34 AM
- 485 Views
I think he was saying ...
10/06/2010 03:10:08 AM
- 438 Views