So I'd probably still be torturing the guy when that family member dies.
JUST FOR FUN.
And I'd crack open a beer afterwards and wink at the camera.
!
JUST FOR FUN.
And I'd crack open a beer afterwards and wink at the camera.
!
Kuke.
An Ethical Survey
16/04/2010 12:48:44 AM
- 522 Views
I'd torture more people for fun after saving the friend or family member.
16/04/2010 01:25:43 AM
- 357 Views
So, like... using medical research acquired by Nazi scientists during the Holocaust? *NM*
16/04/2010 04:34:32 AM
- 227 Views
I can't think of many ethical considerations of any sort that would trump dying family member. *NM*
16/04/2010 05:12:43 AM
- 131 Views
This is a total no-brainer, as per above responses. Star Trek clearly needs better moral dilemmas.
16/04/2010 09:44:43 AM
- 305 Views
This question kind of raised it's head in a recent Bad Science column
16/04/2010 01:25:12 PM
- 419 Views
I think it would be unethical to let someone else die to protect your moral values *NM*
16/04/2010 02:16:54 PM
- 128 Views
Possibly not, but only if it would be immoral for your victims to refuse to cure your loved one.
16/04/2010 04:33:38 PM
- 328 Views
I have no ethics or morals or whatever.
16/04/2010 05:47:56 PM
- 324 Views