The way you got it was wrong. But now you have it. So use it.
ironclad Send a noteboard - 16/04/2010 11:34:42 AM
Otherwise there was no point in going unethical to get it
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
An Ethical Survey
16/04/2010 12:48:44 AM
- 524 Views
I'd torture more people for fun after saving the friend or family member.
16/04/2010 01:25:43 AM
- 358 Views
So, like... using medical research acquired by Nazi scientists during the Holocaust? *NM*
16/04/2010 04:34:32 AM
- 227 Views
I can't think of many ethical considerations of any sort that would trump dying family member. *NM*
16/04/2010 05:12:43 AM
- 131 Views
This is a total no-brainer, as per above responses. Star Trek clearly needs better moral dilemmas.
16/04/2010 09:44:43 AM
- 307 Views
The way you got it was wrong. But now you have it. So use it.
16/04/2010 11:34:42 AM
- 304 Views
This question kind of raised it's head in a recent Bad Science column
16/04/2010 01:25:12 PM
- 421 Views
I think it would be unethical to let someone else die to protect your moral values *NM*
16/04/2010 02:16:54 PM
- 128 Views
Possibly not, but only if it would be immoral for your victims to refuse to cure your loved one.
16/04/2010 04:33:38 PM
- 330 Views