Active Users:527 Time:05/04/2025 10:26:25 AM
I wondered that too Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM
Unless I've got it backwards, it looks like that would make more sense.


But it's still a bit off I think. I would expect someone of that height and weight to be a 12.


But if the whole focus is to reassure women in America what the "averages" in America are, it's rather misleading to use the higher-numbered system I think.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1273 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 593 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 651 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 550 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 618 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 645 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 699 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 744 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 592 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 589 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 824 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 679 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 647 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 635 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 655 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 599 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 570 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 592 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 714 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 676 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 703 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 607 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 559 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 570 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 530 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 592 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 688 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 802 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 660 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 911 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 603 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 638 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 599 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 631 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 556 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 547 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 648 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 731 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 289 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 572 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 288 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 656 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 635 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 307 Views

Reply to Message