Active Users:1204 Time:22/11/2024 08:42:12 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It would make more sense... Zeeb Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM
Unless I've got it backwards, it looks like that would make more sense.


But it's still a bit off I think. I would expect someone of that height and weight to be a 12.
TOES
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1207 Views
Scary but hardly surprising random thoughts - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 522 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 581 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? random thoughts - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 475 Views
Both, in certain areas. nossy - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 550 Views
yes. Gena - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 571 Views
Well also... Gena - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 632 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. The_Muted_Grimaud - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 663 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 525 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? Legolas - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 511 Views
No I mean beautiful random thoughts - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 758 Views
Hrm Sareitha Sedai - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 607 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. nossy - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 578 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 560 Views
Sareitha is right about the range nossy - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 588 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range j-whitt987 - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 554 Views
You're not 5'8" Tigr - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 493 Views
Yes I am. nossy - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 522 Views
Yes she is. Gena - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 648 Views
To be fair, snoopcester - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 612 Views
ha! Gena - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 634 Views
5'8" here... Lici - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 537 Views
Yes. Spriteling - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 488 Views
Are they British sizes? nossy - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 493 Views
It would make more sense... Zeeb - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 464 Views
I wondered that too Sareitha Sedai - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 525 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? Gena - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 609 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure Zeeb - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 736 Views
Yes though Gena - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 582 Views
No, American. Tor - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 846 Views
Er, that was me. Spriteling - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 535 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? nossy - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 564 Views
Okay, let's be relative. Spriteling - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 534 Views
Erm.... snoopcester - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 557 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. LiterateDog - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 491 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... Legolas - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 477 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... LaSombra - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 580 Views
It's not. Seriana Sedai - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 662 Views
O.O *NM* globug0822 - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 267 Views
interesting and scary... LaSombra - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 509 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* Mat Girl - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 263 Views
I actually Gena - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 592 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs random thoughts - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 570 Views
exactly! *NM* Gena - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 280 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes