Active Users:1138 Time:22/11/2024 05:33:40 PM
Holy crap Wibble Send a noteboard - 05/04/2010 01:42:21 PM
I am amazed. Not that he was traded, but to a division rival? That almost never happens.


I'm totally mixed on this one. I'd been hoping they'd finally make a move in the draft on a franchise QB, maybe trading up for Bradford if they could, otherwise taking Clausen. But at the same time, knew they probably needed a career OT for the left side more, so maybe take Colt at 37 and bring him in easy over the season with Campbell taking the hits. Instead we get McNabb who's already an 11 year franchise QB.

At 33 how much longer does a mobile QB like McNabb have? Then again, he played superb last season, and he'll be dying to do over the eagles for the next few seasons.

Tricky one over all. Redskins are in a dire state due to so many bad trades of draft picks for overblown premadonnas. But McNabb is most certainly not a premadonna, he's a hard worker, and it's not a 1st round draft pick (it's a 2nd and mid next season), so the deal was probably worth making.

Redskins still need a franchise QB in the next few years, but McNabb gives them time to make the right choice and can take them to the playoffs meantime.
Reply to message
Donovan McNabb to the Redskins? - 05/04/2010 04:27:13 AM 514 Views
I read... - 05/04/2010 04:36:58 AM 371 Views
As a die hard Redskins fan - 05/04/2010 10:48:28 AM 388 Views
Holy crap - 05/04/2010 01:42:21 PM 490 Views
Crazytalk! - 05/04/2010 02:15:16 PM 413 Views
Eh. - 05/04/2010 03:09:07 PM 506 Views
I'm for it. *NM* - 05/04/2010 04:26:32 PM 177 Views
favre to the vikings, for one - 05/04/2010 04:55:10 PM 350 Views
Umm, Favre was traded to the Jets, he just ended up at the Vikings. *NM* - 05/04/2010 04:57:30 PM 387 Views
he *wanted* to go the vikings first though - 05/04/2010 05:11:35 PM 387 Views
Gerard Warren got a safety on Cutler a year after Denver traded him to Chokeland. - 06/04/2010 05:37:46 AM 389 Views
the funny thing is... - 06/04/2010 10:04:44 PM 366 Views
Exactly. - 06/04/2010 11:09:37 PM 383 Views

Reply to Message