Active Users:420 Time:26/11/2024 06:57:21 AM
Re: Not completely certain, but apparently there IS a correlation between Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 10:45:34 PM
How exactly does that work, Mr Friends of the Earth?


the forest coverage of an area and the rainfall it receives.

Not sure how, though.

Coniferous forests get, like, 9 inches a month? On average? Or something?

Edit: Ok, most sorts of coniferous forests are in high rainfall zones. Unless they're elevated.
http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
This message last edited by Danae al'Thor on 24/03/2010 at 10:46:59 PM
Reply to message
Lancashire hates sex. - 24/03/2010 04:21:48 PM 571 Views
that's dumb. people are just going to go elsewhere... *NM* - 24/03/2010 04:42:18 PM 127 Views
Why exactly is dogging an issue for these people? - 24/03/2010 05:17:44 PM 358 Views
Who cares if people are doing it in the woods? Better than in the street! *NM* - 24/03/2010 05:19:33 PM 203 Views
That depends on who you ask.... *NM* - 24/03/2010 08:45:41 PM 139 Views
Why? No one will be watching them. - 25/03/2010 06:35:04 AM 289 Views
"The conifer trees are very valuable in attracting rainfall to the area"? - 24/03/2010 09:41:09 PM 328 Views
Re: Not completely certain, but apparently there IS a correlation between - 24/03/2010 10:45:34 PM 317 Views
That isn't surprising, since trees need rain to grow. - 24/03/2010 10:54:37 PM 328 Views
Hahaha! For ei gås! - 25/03/2010 04:29:04 PM 309 Views
Well it's not entirely idiotic, just mostly idiotic - 25/03/2010 11:29:05 AM 297 Views
Do we REALLY want people breeding next to A666? - 25/03/2010 06:33:55 AM 327 Views
Re: Everything in its time, and a time for everything. *NM* - 25/03/2010 10:39:02 AM 139 Views

Reply to Message