well, given that it's simply a tux vs. a dress
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 12:15:08 PM
I think it'll probably still leave room for the schools to keep kids from going to school in anything that would violate present dress codes. Judges have also said in the past that if a child's "First Amendment" causes a disruption of schooling, it is not permitted. Given that tuxes are formal wear and far from anything too outlandish or risque (is that how that's spelled?), I think that schools will still be able to keep kids from coming to school with, I don't know, peacock feathers sticking out of their heads and a sequin bikini. This wasn't "daisy dukes vs. capri-pants". This was pants vs. dress.
Really, the only result of this I think we'll see is that we'll start seeing more girls at proms in pantsuits and tuxes, and maybe the rare guy here or there showing up in a dress.
Really, the only result of this I think we'll see is that we'll start seeing more girls at proms in pantsuits and tuxes, and maybe the rare guy here or there showing up in a dress.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
So, I see the judge ruled in favor I the lesbian girl whose prom was cancelled.
24/03/2010 07:38:13 AM
- 603 Views
You're both right.
24/03/2010 10:34:50 AM
- 430 Views
The judge has effectively struck down dress codes in public schools
24/03/2010 11:43:39 AM
- 428 Views
well, given that it's simply a tux vs. a dress
24/03/2010 12:15:08 PM
- 366 Views
well since higher courts have up held dress codes I don't think we need to worry to much
24/03/2010 03:20:17 PM
- 352 Views
I want to see what an obscene tuxedo would look like on a woman.....
24/03/2010 05:24:57 PM
- 497 Views
It's airbrushed on.
25/03/2010 07:04:12 AM
- 332 Views