Active Users:802 Time:02/04/2025 11:50:42 AM
I was thinking about this after posting LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM
I think part of the problem is the difference between what constituent want THEN as opposed to NOW.

It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".

But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1298 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 654 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 620 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 766 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 595 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 622 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 556 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 682 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 709 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 632 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 681 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 798 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 591 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 596 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 750 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 311 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 309 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 651 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 904 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 679 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 383 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 309 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1069 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 772 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 618 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 606 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 700 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 332 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 271 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 618 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 629 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 811 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 621 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 625 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 625 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 733 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 806 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 708 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 632 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 608 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 621 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 626 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 547 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 739 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 755 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 633 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 611 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 704 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 595 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 596 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 649 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 612 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 672 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 269 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 705 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 723 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 637 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 607 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 713 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 559 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 565 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 754 Views

Reply to Message