Active Users:1098 Time:23/11/2024 12:02:53 AM
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM
We can kill them on sight. We can torture them, starve them, deny them medical care, all the rest of that stuff. The only things that have any bearing on the treatment of bin Laden, if caught, or any of his ilk, are the rules and regulations of the US Military. If he is caught on US soil, by US law enforcement officers, sure, he would be required to be read his rights or whatever the statutory requirements are for criminal arrests, but military personnel are NOT law enforcement officers (a distinction made legal by posse commitatus, and prisoners they take are presumed to be enemy combatants. Now it may be that the administration or Congress, exercising their Constitutional rights and obligations to command and make rules for the military, respectively, may impose such requirements on the military for their own reasons or based on their judgment, but there is no Constitutional requirement that anything of that sort is required.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
AG Eric Holder evades questioning - 17/03/2010 05:34:40 PM 665 Views
Why should he be read miranda rights? - 17/03/2010 05:50:29 PM 447 Views
You'd rather he walk free on a technicality? - 17/03/2010 11:28:30 PM 411 Views
Line 1 - 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM 546 Views
Last I checked, al-Qaeda isn't a party to the Geneva Convention. - 18/03/2010 09:16:15 AM 468 Views
I suppose I must concede however, ...... - 18/03/2010 10:20:40 AM 489 Views
just to play devil's advocate... - 18/03/2010 05:18:16 PM 400 Views
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game. - 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM 403 Views
Not to mention Miranda is crap anyway. - 19/03/2010 10:18:46 PM 393 Views
*shrugs* - 17/03/2010 11:10:47 PM 408 Views
That doesn't seem very logical - 18/03/2010 12:03:21 AM 496 Views
It is very possible - 18/03/2010 02:12:21 AM 357 Views
Re: It is very possible - 18/03/2010 02:31:59 AM 462 Views
You do remember "I do not recall" Gonzalez right? *NM* - 18/03/2010 02:38:48 AM 167 Views
Actually not really, I was out of the country for almost his entire tenure - 18/03/2010 02:41:13 AM 373 Views
Pretty much there was some political firings of Us Attorneys - 18/03/2010 02:56:01 AM 410 Views
I remember a little of that - 18/03/2010 03:16:27 AM 392 Views
Gonzales flat out lied to congress - 18/03/2010 03:29:14 AM 380 Views
I don't think I agree with that. - 18/03/2010 02:04:48 PM 398 Views
Fair enough - 18/03/2010 02:40:42 PM 393 Views
You guys are forgetting the intel aspect. - 18/03/2010 09:40:53 PM 413 Views
do we know how much he actually knows? - 18/03/2010 09:49:50 PM 387 Views
Kinda hard to find out if he knows anything if he's dead *NM* - 18/03/2010 09:56:18 PM 178 Views
that was totally not my question - 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM 383 Views
So in sum you are saying - 19/03/2010 12:20:27 AM 401 Views
LOL, it wasn't exactly clear - 19/03/2010 01:42:18 AM 391 Views
Yah, I was just curious how much we were assuming he knew - 19/03/2010 03:05:26 AM 365 Views
I can understand why he'd want to evade answering. - 18/03/2010 03:23:04 AM 457 Views

Reply to Message