But from the viewpoint of fighting a war, the guy shooting at your convoy is by definition a bad guy.
And I think most of us recognize that dimension on a basic level; few would condone life imprisonment of enemy soldiers simply for BEING enemy soldiers, but that seems quite reasonable to me for proven terrorists. Another of the differences, in fact; armies will naturally try to liberate POW camps if practical, but the existence of POWs does not, in itself, become an additional cause for war, because all sides know POWs will ultimately be released after hostilities end.
It's really a pretty basic difference: The enemy soldier and the terrorist are both your foe, but one of them tries to stop you by killing you; the other is too cowardly for that and instead tries to murder your kids so you stop yourself. That's why Sgt. York got a medal and Lt. Calley got a court martial.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t.
- 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM
1912 Views
Lot of BS in there
- 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM
701 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this.
- 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM
640 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart.
- 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM
600 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety.
- 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM
623 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM
239 Views
I did note the rampant bias.
- 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM
714 Views
- 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM
714 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier...
- 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
632 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers?
- 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM
768 Views
I would agree with this.
- 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM
686 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later.
- 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM
731 Views
- 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM
731 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions"
- 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM
610 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe.
- 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM
604 Views
I think you missed the point.
- 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM
600 Views
One of us did.
- 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM
781 Views
- 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM
781 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY
- 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM
613 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally.
- 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM
663 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC
- 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM
793 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason.
- 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM
751 Views
WTF? Are these people serious?
- 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM
634 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM
250 Views
So I presume the article meant to highlight that Muslim American citizens aren't all that violent?
- 03/02/2010 04:17:06 AM
671 Views
How many other attacks killed almost 3,000 people of over 90 different nations?
- 03/02/2010 06:26:23 AM
678 Views
