They have abused the word liberal so badly that they won't even use it any more so I see no reason to let them do the same to the word progress.

So what does that make Congress?
Today's Political Silliness is brought to you by the Letters, Y and T.

Castle: This is so weird. I dressed up as him for Halloween.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Why does the American interpretation of "liberal" differ from the European?
09/02/2010 09:15:39 AM
- 787 Views
For the last century or so liberal has meant the same in the UK as in the US.
09/02/2010 09:30:07 AM
- 692 Views
Because the US started off with the idea of freedom of individuals...
09/02/2010 09:40:59 AM
- 557 Views
Using that word "marxist" really undermines the credibility of your post.
*NM*
09/02/2010 10:25:42 AM
- 194 Views

Only to people who don't understand Marxism in the slightest!
*NM*
09/02/2010 02:32:39 PM
- 197 Views

Eh, obviously you can point to elements of Marxist influence in the Democratic Party...
09/02/2010 02:52:34 PM
- 515 Views
Anytime the people who object to an ideology are permitted to define it...
09/02/2010 10:56:46 PM
- 469 Views
Because they got offended when they were called socialist and progressive didn't stick *NM*
09/02/2010 02:09:10 PM
- 201 Views
Hah. Progressive wasn't dirty-sounding enough for the other side to go along with it
*NM*
09/02/2010 07:35:35 PM
- 229 Views

no were just not willing to let them soil another word
09/02/2010 08:18:58 PM
- 474 Views

And to think, the antonym to Pro is Con...
09/02/2010 08:52:30 PM
- 525 Views
1988. george bush vs. michael dukakis
10/02/2010 03:37:13 AM
- 513 Views
In America we typically now refer to true liberals (i.e. Locke) as "classical liberal(ism)"
12/02/2010 05:06:38 AM
- 585 Views