Active Users:628 Time:25/11/2024 09:47:28 AM
Poor thing. Looks like your children could use some time in those dirty swamps. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 08/02/2010 04:23:21 AM
Poor widdle colts ought to go back into the stable and play with their mamas before trying to play with the big dogs. :D
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
I guess I'll be the first to say it... Who Dat? - 08/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1052 Views
*SPITS* - 08/02/2010 02:48:41 AM 718 Views
...wow. Someone's more than a little bitter. *NM* - 08/02/2010 03:47:23 AM 391 Views
Indeed - 08/02/2010 03:52:53 AM 693 Views
Poor thing. Looks like your children could use some time in those dirty swamps. - 08/02/2010 04:23:21 AM 667 Views
Jesus christ I'm sorry, that was uncalled for - 08/02/2010 04:52:23 AM 630 Views
Yeah, well, sucks to suck. Not our fault we're better. - 08/02/2010 04:56:06 AM 710 Views
Since she changed her reply - 08/02/2010 04:59:36 AM 683 Views
I do love Charlie and the Chocolate Factory *NM* - 08/02/2010 05:04:03 AM 344 Views
And I love Willie Wonka & The Chocolate Factory *NM* - 08/02/2010 02:13:00 PM 369 Views
Indeed. The Gene Wilder version is the better one. *NM* - 08/02/2010 05:44:05 PM 361 Views
As do I. But I was referring to the book! *NM* - 08/02/2010 05:49:25 PM 374 Views
What the hell, people. - 08/02/2010 03:31:09 PM 624 Views
Dunno, what is it about the anonimity of the internet that makes people like you - 08/02/2010 04:10:38 PM 785 Views
lol - 08/02/2010 04:20:52 PM 559 Views
It's kind of you to defend me - 08/02/2010 06:16:34 PM 675 Views
Not entirely sure what you mean, since I didn't edit any of my posts. - 08/02/2010 08:24:07 PM 849 Views
I'm the one who edited two replies - 08/02/2010 08:34:45 PM 559 Views
I guess I really don't get the game, then. - 08/02/2010 08:51:25 PM 685 Views
Well, football is a game where you should respond in kind. - 08/02/2010 09:37:36 PM 867 Views
I disagree, Ghavrel, about the sexiness. Its very alpha-male. And very hot. - 08/02/2010 08:55:29 PM 554 Views
I'll bear that in mind. *NM* - 08/02/2010 09:38:57 PM 334 Views
No worries. I admit to having had fun with you. *NM* - 08/02/2010 05:01:33 AM 338 Views
That is horrible fan-sportsmanship. You should be ashamed. *NM* - 08/02/2010 04:46:58 AM 380 Views
Sorry Chorabliss, I shouldn't have replied when I was angry - 08/02/2010 04:52:52 AM 658 Views
No worries. *NM* - 08/02/2010 04:56:45 AM 359 Views
And I'll be the first European to say this... - 08/02/2010 03:11:03 AM 547 Views
Oh I thought you were gonna say... - 08/02/2010 03:43:59 PM 738 Views
Nah, it was fun. Also, see my reply below. *NM* - 08/02/2010 03:44:27 PM 365 Views
I guess I'll be the first Australian to say this then - 08/02/2010 03:16:08 AM 560 Views
Yup. The onside kick was a ballsy call and blew everyone away. *NM* - 08/02/2010 06:47:54 AM 270 Views
it was a really good game until that interception - 08/02/2010 10:42:09 AM 489 Views
They are world champs. - 08/02/2010 04:00:04 PM 848 Views
There are American football leagues elsewhere (even if they don't matter). - 08/02/2010 04:12:44 PM 705 Views
besides canada (CFL), arena football, and NFL europe, how many others? - 09/02/2010 01:43:25 AM 597 Views
Oh, there are plenty. - 09/02/2010 10:41:11 AM 625 Views
I don't know I think the talent difference is great enough to justify the title - 09/02/2010 02:33:03 PM 522 Views
Yeah, no, that's not how it works. - 09/02/2010 02:55:51 PM 621 Views
You make a good point (as does Legolas as well) - 09/02/2010 12:39:04 AM 640 Views
I never hear Super Bowl winners referred to as "World Champions". - 08/02/2010 05:47:48 PM 591 Views
Wish I could be on Bourbon Street tonight - 08/02/2010 04:19:10 AM 492 Views
That interception... I have no words. *NM* - 08/02/2010 04:23:53 AM 386 Views
Yeah that was pretty cool - 08/02/2010 04:47:11 AM 679 Views
Exactly... who would have thought that Peyton Manning would choke?? - 08/02/2010 07:13:09 AM 683 Views
i wouldn't call it choking per se... - 08/02/2010 10:36:27 AM 529 Views
I disagree. - 08/02/2010 03:44:52 PM 680 Views
I still don't get how that clock works. - 08/02/2010 03:51:09 PM 668 Views
True. - 08/02/2010 03:59:14 PM 709 Views
it is a very fine line to walk - 08/02/2010 04:06:26 PM 724 Views
Re: i wouldn't call it choking per se... - 08/02/2010 05:04:04 PM 684 Views
Re: Exactly... who would have thought that Peyton Manning would choke?? - 08/02/2010 11:31:34 AM 633 Views
I don't consider it a choke. *NM* - 08/02/2010 05:49:17 PM 337 Views
Yeah I should rephrase that - 08/02/2010 06:03:23 PM 696 Views
Excellent Game. Two thumbs up. *NM* - 08/02/2010 06:01:39 AM 337 Views
my only complaint - 08/02/2010 10:38:43 AM 661 Views
Isn't that one of the problems of the entire sport? - 08/02/2010 03:04:32 PM 692 Views
I think it is more complicated then that - 08/02/2010 04:01:10 PM 620 Views
Well, he did match the record for completions in a game. - 08/02/2010 05:51:10 PM 606 Views
It's not quite that bad - 08/02/2010 07:38:04 PM 568 Views
Good game, Saints. - 08/02/2010 01:15:51 PM 507 Views
Oh, and one funny thing about this... - 08/02/2010 03:43:36 PM 641 Views
*NM* - 08/02/2010 03:46:29 PM 327 Views

Reply to Message