Active Users:735 Time:15/11/2024 04:50:39 PM
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" beckstcw Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM
I'm replying to both of you, so I didn't know exactly where to put this :P

In the end, the "definition" of whether a jihadist is an insurgent/terrorist/guerilla warrior/super-late term abortion doctor doesn't really matter.

If a guy attacks a US convoy one day, and then the next day attacks an orphanage, his status doesn't really matter, does it? He's a bad guy that needs to be killed.

So to me, the whole definition debate is moot anyway.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1704 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 397 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 506 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 461 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 414 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 438 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 178 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 403 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 175 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 513 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 424 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 186 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 432 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 463 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 164 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 406 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 499 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 458 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 588 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 501 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 532 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 410 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 400 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 405 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 578 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 407 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 474 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 601 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 549 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 751 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 556 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 396 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 517 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 449 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 170 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 177 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 381 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 421 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 466 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 357 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 407 Views

Reply to Message