Active Users:664 Time:15/11/2024 06:24:32 PM
Whose complaint is valid? Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM
I'm hoping you agree with me that calling the author of that reply "an Islamophobe" is idiotic and evidence of a mentality that's almost as black and white as what he's reproaching the "Islamophobes". Nitpicking about robbery or arson really doesn't change the validity of this guy's point.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1706 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 399 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 507 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 462 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 416 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 438 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 178 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 405 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 175 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 515 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 426 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 186 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 433 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 465 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 164 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 408 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 500 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 460 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 588 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 503 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 533 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 411 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 402 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 407 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 580 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 408 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 475 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 602 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 551 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 753 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 558 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 398 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 519 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 451 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 170 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 177 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 383 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 423 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 468 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 357 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 409 Views

Reply to Message