Active Users:506 Time:17/04/2025 08:19:44 PM
It's not, though. The Shrike Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 03:06:10 PM
If you consider America as consisting of three parts (i.e. with a separate Central-America), it makes most sense to put Mexico into that central one. If you view it as having only two parts, well, yeah... :P


If we are going to use the term North-America, then we are discussing continents and not cultural zones(in which parts of Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona would more fully belong to "Central America". Since, according to modern definition there are seven continents, Mexico must fall into one of them. And it currently falls into North America. For instance, the economic zone, NAFTA includes Mexico.

According to modern geographical definition, everything up to the borders of Panama with Colombia is North America.

So three parts would work for non geographical-standard definitions. But once we start using terms like North America then it's not defensible.
Reply to message
According to Phelix (Jono), Mexicans are not North Americans *NM* - 29/01/2010 01:26:00 AM 388 Views
Heh, oddly enough, that was my first choice for an example of FML. - 29/01/2010 01:35:51 AM 435 Views
In Jono defense he was going to consume some tequila about 15 mins after he made this comment - 29/01/2010 01:39:37 AM 447 Views
The intent to drink tequila is evidence of existing impairment. - 29/01/2010 01:44:47 AM 439 Views
personally I am a vodka fan - 29/01/2010 01:49:26 AM 436 Views
Agreed; good scotch is perhaps best though. - 29/01/2010 02:00:07 AM 514 Views
Well, Mexico is often considered Central-America, so it's defensible... - 29/01/2010 01:43:57 AM 456 Views
I think of Mexico as distinct from Central America. - 29/01/2010 01:47:29 AM 481 Views
Kinda interesting. Culturally, I'd imagine Mexico has more in common with the south than the north - 29/01/2010 01:54:00 AM 469 Views
Which part? - 29/01/2010 02:47:56 AM 444 Views
Yes, but SINCE then - 29/01/2010 08:41:31 AM 450 Views
Again, it depends where you are. - 29/01/2010 11:25:11 AM 446 Views
It is often considred Latin American *NM* - 29/01/2010 03:53:07 AM 198 Views
That's something else. - 29/01/2010 10:37:33 AM 438 Views
Yes I know what Latin American means - 29/01/2010 01:45:12 PM 461 Views
Wrongly so. The bulk of Mexico lies on the North American Plate. - 29/01/2010 04:19:19 AM 488 Views
That was my first thought, too *NM* - 29/01/2010 08:44:47 AM 203 Views
It's not, though. - 01/02/2010 03:06:10 PM 517 Views
He's pretty, it's true. But what he says is not. *NM* - 29/01/2010 01:59:46 AM 216 Views
He is pretty *NM* - 29/01/2010 02:03:20 AM 204 Views
I'm going to disregard that entirely. - 29/01/2010 06:28:18 AM 491 Views
Gays also aren't North American. They're not even humans. *NM* - 29/01/2010 11:09:39 PM 212 Views
I thought Iran was the only place that didn't have gays *NM* - 30/01/2010 02:22:51 AM 209 Views
No I am pretty sure that gays don't exist in the Armed Forces as well *NM* - 30/01/2010 02:28:59 AM 196 Views
Re: No I am pretty sure that gays don't exist in the Armed Forces as well - 30/01/2010 06:41:18 PM 464 Views
we can't be sue because we can't ask *NM* - 30/01/2010 07:58:51 PM 213 Views
it is a binary question there is as an answer yes or no - 30/01/2010 11:27:20 PM 456 Views
looks like they could possibly be changing soon - 01/02/2010 05:29:25 PM 431 Views

Reply to Message