Based on the documentary IOUSA:
The National Center for Policy Analysis released a paper by Pamela Villarreal highlighting the results of the 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports.
Some highlights:
The 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports show the combined unfunded liability of these two programs has reached nearly $107 trillion in today's dollars! That is about seven times the size of the U.S. economy and 10 times the size of the outstanding national debt, says Pamela Villarreal, a senior policy analyst with the National Center for Policy Analysis.
The unfunded liability is the difference between the benefits that have been promised to current and future retirees and what will be collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums. Last year alone, this debt rose by $5 trillion. If no other reform is enacted, this funding gap can only be closed in future years by substantial tax increases, large benefit cuts or both, says Villarreal.
Currently, a 12.4 percent payroll tax on wages funds Social Security and a 2.9 percent payroll tax funds Medicare Part A. But if payroll tax rates rise to meet unfunded obligations:
When today's college students reach retirement (about 2054), Social Security alone will require a 16.6 percent payroll tax, one-third greater than today's rate.
When Medicare Part A is included, the payroll tax burden will rise to 25.7 percent -- more than one of every four dollars workers will earn that year.
If Medicare Part B (physician services) and Part D are included, the total Social Security/Medicare burden will climb to 37 percent of payroll by 2054 -- one in three dollars of taxable payroll, and twice the size of today's payroll tax burden!
Thus, more than one-third of the wages workers earn in 2054 will need to be committed to pay benefits promised under current law. That is before any bridges or highways are built and before any teachers' or police officers' salaries are paid.
The Social Security and Medicare deficits are on a course to engulf the entire federal budget. If our policymakers wait to address these growing debts until they are out of control, the solutions will be drastic and painful, says Villarreal.
The National Center for Policy Analysis released a paper by Pamela Villarreal highlighting the results of the 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports.
Some highlights:
The 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports show the combined unfunded liability of these two programs has reached nearly $107 trillion in today's dollars! That is about seven times the size of the U.S. economy and 10 times the size of the outstanding national debt, says Pamela Villarreal, a senior policy analyst with the National Center for Policy Analysis.
The unfunded liability is the difference between the benefits that have been promised to current and future retirees and what will be collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums. Last year alone, this debt rose by $5 trillion. If no other reform is enacted, this funding gap can only be closed in future years by substantial tax increases, large benefit cuts or both, says Villarreal.
Currently, a 12.4 percent payroll tax on wages funds Social Security and a 2.9 percent payroll tax funds Medicare Part A. But if payroll tax rates rise to meet unfunded obligations:
When today's college students reach retirement (about 2054), Social Security alone will require a 16.6 percent payroll tax, one-third greater than today's rate.
When Medicare Part A is included, the payroll tax burden will rise to 25.7 percent -- more than one of every four dollars workers will earn that year.
If Medicare Part B (physician services) and Part D are included, the total Social Security/Medicare burden will climb to 37 percent of payroll by 2054 -- one in three dollars of taxable payroll, and twice the size of today's payroll tax burden!
Thus, more than one-third of the wages workers earn in 2054 will need to be committed to pay benefits promised under current law. That is before any bridges or highways are built and before any teachers' or police officers' salaries are paid.
The Social Security and Medicare deficits are on a course to engulf the entire federal budget. If our policymakers wait to address these growing debts until they are out of control, the solutions will be drastic and painful, says Villarreal.
*MySmiley*
For Europeans who don't understand why Americans are against ObamaCare
03/09/2009 04:24:35 AM
- 1152 Views
I'd be happy to tax top "earners" more and suffer Europes economic "collapse. "
03/09/2009 04:30:31 AM
- 626 Views
The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:40:21 AM
- 710 Views
Re: The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:58:47 AM
- 702 Views
I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
03/09/2009 05:04:34 AM
- 621 Views
It's advanced beyond what it was during the Revolution, I think.
03/09/2009 05:18:22 AM
- 662 Views
I would say it's grown with the government
03/09/2009 05:23:52 AM
- 649 Views
The key is that government shouldn't be heavily involved in personal lives.
03/09/2009 05:58:39 AM
- 669 Views
Re: I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
04/09/2009 03:30:23 AM
- 587 Views
How much more can we really tax the wealthy??
03/09/2009 04:41:14 AM
- 551 Views
A lot; before Reagans "reforms" we already taxed them less than any other industrialized state did.
03/09/2009 05:06:00 AM
- 667 Views
I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:19:08 AM
- 531 Views
Re: I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:40:32 AM
- 618 Views
Nice non-answer answer.....
03/09/2009 05:52:04 AM
- 627 Views
You want detailed answers that require detailed data I don't have.
03/09/2009 06:06:55 AM
- 683 Views
Here are some facts and analyses.....
03/09/2009 02:40:22 PM
- 706 Views
The Heritage Foundation, huh?
03/09/2009 03:01:17 PM
- 735 Views
The non-working wealthy? Please quantify.....
03/09/2009 03:31:58 PM
- 719 Views
So you accept the CBOs assessment the House healthcare bill will be $1 trillion over the next decade
04/09/2009 03:02:13 AM
- 610 Views
You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:15:55 AM
- 700 Views
Re: You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:59:21 AM
- 786 Views
Less than 200 people were said to be US persons with Swiss accounts
04/09/2009 04:16:24 AM
- 582 Views
And yet account for many millions of dollars; what does that say...?
04/09/2009 04:21:57 AM
- 617 Views
It's statistically insignificant and your hyperbole is reminiscent of screaming guests on CNN.
04/09/2009 02:07:31 PM
- 518 Views
Well, look at this way:
04/09/2009 02:24:03 PM
- 660 Views
That's not a solution.
05/09/2009 02:39:12 AM
- 669 Views
The Soviets weren't socialist, or even communist, so it's a false comparison.
05/09/2009 03:09:06 AM
- 610 Views
Okay, now you've just gone into Kool-aid drinking territory.
05/09/2009 04:32:07 AM
- 720 Views
Communist THEORY is predicated on democratic participation at every level,totally absent in the USSR
05/09/2009 04:55:00 AM
- 838 Views
Ever heard of the 20-80 rule?
04/09/2009 04:28:54 AM
- 529 Views
Top earners? Please define.....what income and how much more? *NM*
03/09/2009 04:52:25 AM
- 429 Views
That would be open to definition, and should change with inflation.
03/09/2009 05:13:02 AM
- 779 Views
What is your justification for taking over 50% of anyone's income?
03/09/2009 05:28:22 AM
- 709 Views
That's a good example of why I say the rate has to be set to cost of living.
03/09/2009 05:50:16 AM
- 741 Views
Still no comment on the fact that 40% of Americans don't pay any income taxes?
03/09/2009 02:32:12 PM
- 669 Views
To what 40% do you refer?
03/09/2009 02:42:55 PM
- 525 Views
Dude, you are not making this easy.....
03/09/2009 03:38:01 PM
- 562 Views
No one "gets money from the IRS. "
04/09/2009 02:55:02 AM
- 576 Views
Actually with EIC you can get money back that you never paid in.
04/09/2009 02:56:43 AM
- 560 Views
It MIGHT be possible with the EIC, but in practice few people get more than they paid.
04/09/2009 03:43:36 AM
- 598 Views
I don't know, I've known plenty of people that have gotten more back than they paid in
04/09/2009 03:46:29 AM
- 691 Views
Yet another example of your ignorance on tax policy.
04/09/2009 03:19:39 AM
- 512 Views
The word I notice is "welfare"
04/09/2009 03:57:01 AM
- 628 Views
I wouldn't say that's what it means....
04/09/2009 04:02:40 AM
- 631 Views
It's what welfare means to me...
04/09/2009 04:32:17 AM
- 636 Views
I was just talking about EIC as a form of welfare, not welfare welfare. *NM*
04/09/2009 04:45:13 AM
- 387 Views
It's a credit for people who file a return on income that's been taxed.
04/09/2009 04:19:57 AM
- 561 Views
It is only for the WORKING poor, yes.
04/09/2009 02:12:55 PM
- 551 Views
Mean it may be, but hardly illegal.
04/09/2009 02:31:16 PM
- 583 Views
No real comments, just 100% agree with you....plus the $12 trillion is terrifying to me. *NM*
03/09/2009 04:33:39 AM
- 273 Views
If that scares you, check this out!
03/09/2009 04:48:56 AM
- 671 Views
Excellent post - the US government is not capable of running HC.....
03/09/2009 04:40:19 AM
- 505 Views
It depends on your level of cynicism
03/09/2009 05:38:53 AM
- 677 Views
when have they ever cut the fat?
03/09/2009 08:35:36 PM
- 596 Views
This doesn't make sense to me.
03/09/2009 08:33:18 AM
- 644 Views
The key phrase is "should be. "
03/09/2009 09:38:15 AM
- 781 Views
In fairness, most Europeans don't seem to realize what ObamaCare is.
03/09/2009 02:34:01 PM
- 670 Views
As far as most people I know are concerned, opposition to ObamaCare isn't the issue.
03/09/2009 11:04:36 PM
- 741 Views
It's hard not to be horrified with a government as wasteful as ours
03/09/2009 11:24:59 PM
- 526 Views
For Americans who don't understand why Canadians like their public healthcare.
04/09/2009 04:23:11 AM
- 645 Views
Correction
04/09/2009 04:44:32 AM
- 628 Views
Re: Correction
04/09/2009 05:05:11 AM
- 705 Views