Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else.
SilverWarder Send a noteboard - 20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM
I'm trying to avoid taking doctrinal positions on gay marriage too often until I have a firmer idea on what I think that is. Scripturally, it seems to boil down to whether one thinks Pauls writings were inspired by the Holy Spirit entirely, partly, or at all, which is VERY murky, both because everything thought to have left his pen is considered canon (as opposed to the OT, where if a Prophet wanted you to think God was speaking through him he made that VERY clear) and because several of those canonical statements are that others were just Pauls opinion, not Gods command.
Well, I'm on record as NOT being a Paul fan. Given that the man never even met the big JC he seems to be the wrong person to go to for interpretation and wisdom.
Of course, he claims to have had an epiphany from God. No one else was there on that road. Maybe he just had a stroke? Or an attack of schizophrenia? There are folks who claim to hear God telling them to do things and then go out and do them. Sometimes we call those folks holy men. Sometimes we call them lunatics. Sometimes we call them opportunistic evangelical faith healer types. Which was Paul? You go me. He wasn't the most hateful guy ever, but not exactly the most progressive either. I think a lot of the worst bits of the Christian church flow from Paul though.
(Well, okay, if we leave out the Old Testament).
That, and whether one thinks 1) the Holy Spirit actually provided the guidance the first Apostles asked when the issue of the Torah for Gentiles arose and 2) whether one agrees with me that when the response actually uses terms from the Torah it's using them the same way it does.
All open to interpretation, which means all open to not being right.
Not unless He tells us directly, which I don't expect in this world. Again, I think if God encouraged gay marriage homosexuals would be able to produce, but if you pay attention it seems the Bible contains both commands AND instructions, which aren't the same. If your drill instructor says, "Private, drop and give me 50!" that's an order; if he tells you "keep carrying your rifle like that and you'll blow off a toe" you may not get a court martial when it happens, but no one's going to feel sorry for you.
Perhaps the entire reason that homosexuals cannot reproduce is that God foresaw the problems of overpopulation that face us today?
Let's face it - we've been rather a bit too good at being fruitful and multiplying. We need to ramp it down a bit.
<snip>I honestly don't know; I thank God I'm not gay because, while the issue still troubles me, at least I'm not directly affected by the outcome.
I feel for the folks who have to deal with that conflict too. It must be awful.
Love/=sex though (and I'm pretty sure marriages still have to be consummated most places. ) I like sex. A lot. But if I wouldn't drop my girl for someone else if I couldn't get it from her anymore, because I Love her a lot more than I like sex, and the impracticality or inadvisability of sex wouldn't diminish that. Which is probably a good thing given that she's 7000 miles from here right now. Sex doesn't provide the fulfillment of Love, just enhance it, a very nice but not indispensable perk.
Well, at least now you can speak somewhat knowledgeably about the topic.
However keep this in mind - your own personal experience with love and sex is still limited. I can guarantee you this - it WILL change over time. It does for everyone. What it will change INTO - well that varies widely.
I know folks who simply don't need/aren't interested in sex. I know others who have serious psychological issues without that release. Much of it is just the chemical stew in our brains making choices for us.
What's worrisome is that it is now known that even preferences can be subject to change with brain damage or degradation. There is a fellow who got injured, badly, and suddenly *Poof* he was a pedophile. He had all the urges, everything. He was horrified by this and reported it to his doctors. They were able to find and balance out his brain chemically and if he takes his drugs *Poof* he's not anymore.
It's creepy. It's also been proven at this point that certain types of dementia can cause the same thing. Some old folks become pedophiles, probably the origin of the term 'Dirty old man'. There are even some who recommend that men over a certain age be watched closely for signs of developing pedophilia.
If things like that can happen in our brains from age or damage - imagine what else can differ from individual to individual just through the 'normal' range of behaviours etc.
But once again, as long as no one but consenting adults are involved, reasonable men can differ. As with abortion, my advice to those who, like me, don't like it is this: Don't do it, and stay the out of other peoples lives, if only to encourage them to return the favor.
On this we can entirely agree 100%.
Sadly, not everyone sees it that way.
I wouldn't go that far, but it's between them and God, not the state or their neighbors. When the state starts dictating FROM religion it starts dictating ON religion, because it has to decide which religion (and sect) to use. That's precisely and explicitly what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent in the Constitution, both the Bill of Rights and the main document.
Oh, I know. Yet there are those who want to stick the word "GOD" on the top of the flag in blue because of the 'One nation, under God' part of the pledge of allegiance.
Never mind that all that derives from an attempt to be different from the 'Godless Commies' back in 1950 and is not part of the original design of the country at all...
You realize that statement contains a fair amount of faith, in the general sense, right? Last I heard, the search for the "faith gene" hadn't ended (and I ain't holding my breath) but it sounds like you're treating it like Newton treated gravity: A fact yet to be proven.
Only as regards ME, Joel. It's not a universal truth like gravity. I'm only speaking exclusively for myself. I have tried, from time to time, to believe. I have done the occasional spiritual quest and I come back to the same point time and again. I can't believe what folks are telling me to believe. I see the holes and cannot ignore them.
Maybe someday, I'll see something that allows me to believe but I fear that would have to be something concrete enough that it isn't really 'faith' anymore.
I didn't choose this - not in any way. And I cannot 'choose' to have faith as long as my mind works this way. Because deep down I would know I didn't believe and I don't go in for hypocrisy like that.
I can't speak for other folks - just for what I'm experiencing personally.
Faith accepts a preponderance of evidence rather than concrete proof, which is fortunate and practical because, ultimately, it's virtually impossible to absolutely PROVE anything. That's why I get on much better with agnostics than I do atheists; I can respect and sympathize with a man who says, "I don't know" but a man who says, "I know the unknowable" is a conceited zealot whatever his angle.
That's one definition of faith, I suppose, but isn't the generally accepted one more like belief without proof?
And I don't like atheists either. That's just faith of a different colour.
I KNOW Christ is real for reasons similar to Pauls: Either it happened, or I'm a lunatic, but since God can't personally prove HIMSELF a negative (again, inability to do mutually exclusive things isn't a limitation on omnipotence, but on reality) that's not an option for the atheist.
What you know of course, is what you believe to have happened (I recall the story). Yet, things like that have happened to others without God. REALLY strange things happen sometimes.
You have chosen to interpret it as intervention. Very well. I'm not saying you're wrong (for all I know you are entirely right) but it doesn't fly as proof to anyone outside yourself. It might not even fly to someone who had the same experience but simply interpreted it differently.
I don't know how I'd feel. I haven't been through something like that. So cannot comment on it other than to say that not everyone who has similar experiences attributes them to God. Which could mean you're wrong, or they're wrong, or you're both right (maybe God only gets his hands dirty sometimes for his own reasons?).
Which, I believe, is a choice God regretfully allows, though you'll have a hard time convincing universalists. But either we have free will or not, and, however bad an idea it is, if one isn't free to tell God to go Cheney himself in full knowledge of what one is saying, there is no free will. Universalists will usually tell you no one would do that knowing all the facts and everyone will get an omniscient chance to repent after death; me, I figure Lucifer had all the facts and did it anyway. I don't understand it, but a basic tenet of my faith is that it IS possible.
Well, recall that what I'm saying is that IF God were the mean spirited bastard some folks make him out to be then I'd choose the other side - and rightly too I think.
On the other hand, if others are right and God is more interested in the whole person rather than going all lawyery on someone, then that's fine with me. I can admire and respect that.
I don't think it's inability, it's just one of the myriad examples of barriers erected between us and God by the legacy of sin in the world. You're not the first Greek to look for wisdom, y'know, but if faith were simply something you figured out on your own Grace wouldn't be a free gift to the glory of God, but your just due for accomplishments to your glory.
You rather lost me after that point.
Let me ask a rather straightforward question. An honest one - in your opinion, how could someone like me go about trying to accomplish faith? Is there a way that doesn't make one a hypocrite?
That's not an invite to preach or pray - it's much more serious than that.
Man can do some glorious things, but only insofar as it reflects Gods glory bestowed on us; when we go free agent... well, as you note, we aren't perfect. Because we tried to go free agent, or so the stories say.
Pfah. If there is Freewill than the Glorious things we do are because WE chose to do them. The credit goes to the man.
If we choose poorly the fault equally goes to the man.
Freewill means just that. We choose well, we deserve the cred, we choose badly, we deserve the cred for that too.
Otherwise the term is meaningless.
May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.
Old Egyptian Blessing
Old Egyptian Blessing
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage
17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM
- 1401 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part
17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM
- 710 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin.
17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM
- 719 Views
God your a moron.
17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM
- 658 Views
That was remarkably unconstructive.
18/01/2010 12:13:45 AM
- 532 Views
youll have to excuse Adam, he is a Heathen, its not his fault *NM*
18/01/2010 06:26:34 AM
- 257 Views
Ad hominems w/o substance are never excusable, especially in one who knows beter: They're forfeits.
18/01/2010 06:39:33 AM
- 556 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like
18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM
- 623 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else.
18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM
- 632 Views
Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else.
20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM
- 584 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument.
17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM
- 609 Views
LOL... *NM*
18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM
- 338 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive.
18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM
- 535 Views
First, I'm nothing at all like Adam.
18/01/2010 06:33:54 AM
- 598 Views
I was similarly unclear what prompted the comments, but I only needed you to elaborate a little.
18/01/2010 07:37:43 AM
- 699 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM*
17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM
- 409 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM*
17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM
- 268 Views
seriously. *NM*
17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM
- 228 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM*
19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM
- 297 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate.
18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM
- 702 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care?
18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM
- 535 Views
Correct
18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM
- 618 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments,
18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM
- 611 Views
Thank you.
20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM
- 761 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me.
21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM
- 621 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about?
27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM
- 500 Views
we do not exist in a free market.
18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM
- 542 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM*
18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM
- 276 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment.
18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM
- 496 Views
That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM
- 572 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM
- 593 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM
- 661 Views
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
18/01/2010 07:49:27 AM
- 566 Views
I really dont like the idea of a black person marrying a white person
18/01/2010 06:36:26 AM
- 647 Views
That's such an amusing argument
18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM
- 536 Views
And you're fairly appalling in either pretending to misunderstand free markets or in your stupidity
27/01/2010 03:00:21 AM
- 729 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM*
19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM
- 234 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM*
19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM
- 213 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta
21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM
- 487 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't
18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM
- 643 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM*
18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM
- 206 Views
I don't think it was that clear
18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM
- 557 Views