Active Users:688 Time:19/12/2024 01:36:26 PM
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM
There are legal rights only granted to spouses, ranging from medical to tax-related. How does whether a preacher presidse over the union or not have any bearing on whether those rights are warranted? If you think that from a economic and legal standpoint, civil unions have no purpose, then religious unions have no purpose in that light either.


Civil laws and customs granting such rights or privileges to marriage are recognizing a long-standing and wide-spread practice. Laws granting those same privileges to same-sex partnerships are imposing a novelty practice. There is no basis for same sex marriage, because the practices and customs associated with marriage originate with the difference in genders, a situation which does not apply to same-sex unions.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage - 17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM 1403 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part - 17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM 711 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin. - 17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM 721 Views
God your a moron. - 17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM 660 Views
be nice - 18/01/2010 06:26:58 AM 573 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like - 18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM 623 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM 634 Views
Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 585 Views
It is, I believe, hardest for the intelligent educated man. - 21/01/2010 10:29:39 AM 712 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM 610 Views
LOL... *NM* - 18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM 338 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive. - 18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM 537 Views
why do you imply "constructive" is in anyway the intent? *NM* - 18/01/2010 06:32:27 AM 262 Views
*shrug* I never stopped believing in lost causes? - 18/01/2010 07:36:04 AM 525 Views
Re: You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 18/01/2010 06:28:41 AM 665 Views
Always welcome. - 18/01/2010 07:31:27 AM 761 Views
We finally converted you - 17/01/2010 08:43:25 PM 549 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM* - 17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM 409 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM* - 17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM 268 Views
seriously. *NM* - 17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM 228 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM* - 19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM 297 Views
yeah no kidding - 18/01/2010 06:30:45 AM 537 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate. - 18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM 703 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care? - 18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM 535 Views
Correct - 18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM 620 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments, - 18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM 613 Views
Thank you. - 20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM 763 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me. - 21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM 621 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about? - 27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM 502 Views
Link? - 27/01/2010 09:28:22 AM 591 Views
I can't find a link to the exact quote - 27/01/2010 12:14:19 PM 710 Views
Re: Link? - 27/01/2010 01:38:36 PM 729 Views
Perhaps we should define our terms more precisely. - 15/02/2010 11:28:09 AM 1090 Views
we do not exist in a free market. - 18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM 542 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM 276 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment. - 18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM 498 Views
No I am not. - 19/01/2010 10:44:31 PM 620 Views
That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM 574 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM 595 Views
civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 18/01/2010 04:49:12 AM 571 Views
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM 631 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:13:54 AM 576 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 19/01/2010 10:59:45 PM 544 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM 662 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 20/01/2010 01:38:37 AM 458 Views
Are you at all surprised? - 18/01/2010 07:59:30 AM 569 Views
A truly free country means I don't have the freedom to shoot you - 18/01/2010 05:57:44 AM 654 Views
You really said nothing, right there. - 18/01/2010 08:34:33 AM 608 Views
I presume you are equally against the current set up - 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM 648 Views
He said as much in his response to me above. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:37:49 PM 224 Views
That's such an amusing argument - 18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM 536 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM* - 19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM 234 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM* - 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM 213 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta - 21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM 489 Views
I can't help but find it funny - 18/01/2010 12:51:57 PM 506 Views
So... - 18/01/2010 03:39:33 PM 637 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out - 18/01/2010 04:11:05 PM 533 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't - 18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM 645 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM 206 Views
I don't think it was that clear - 18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM 558 Views
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM 600 Views
I wasn't taking sides - 18/01/2010 10:57:39 PM 475 Views

Reply to Message