Active Users:1366 Time:19/09/2026 11:11:43 PM
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM
There are legal rights only granted to spouses, ranging from medical to tax-related. How does whether a preacher presidse over the union or not have any bearing on whether those rights are warranted? If you think that from a economic and legal standpoint, civil unions have no purpose, then religious unions have no purpose in that light either.


Civil laws and customs granting such rights or privileges to marriage are recognizing a long-standing and wide-spread practice. Laws granting those same privileges to same-sex partnerships are imposing a novelty practice. There is no basis for same sex marriage, because the practices and customs associated with marriage originate with the difference in genders, a situation which does not apply to same-sex unions.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage - 17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM 1742 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part - 17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM 1065 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin. - 17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM 1068 Views
God your a moron. - 17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM 1001 Views
be nice - 18/01/2010 06:26:58 AM 943 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like - 18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM 1010 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM 965 Views
Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 936 Views
It is, I believe, hardest for the intelligent educated man. - 21/01/2010 10:29:39 AM 1083 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM 964 Views
LOL... *NM* - 18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM 529 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive. - 18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM 855 Views
why do you imply "constructive" is in anyway the intent? *NM* - 18/01/2010 06:32:27 AM 420 Views
*shrug* I never stopped believing in lost causes? - 18/01/2010 07:36:04 AM 859 Views
Re: You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 18/01/2010 06:28:41 AM 1062 Views
Always welcome. - 18/01/2010 07:31:27 AM 1113 Views
We finally converted you - 17/01/2010 08:43:25 PM 876 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM* - 17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM 565 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM* - 17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM 437 Views
seriously. *NM* - 17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM 386 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM* - 19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM 483 Views
yeah no kidding - 18/01/2010 06:30:45 AM 863 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate. - 18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM 1102 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care? - 18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM 870 Views
Correct - 18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM 951 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments, - 18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM 941 Views
Thank you. - 20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM 1114 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me. - 21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM 997 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about? - 27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM 847 Views
Link? - 27/01/2010 09:28:22 AM 967 Views
I can't find a link to the exact quote - 27/01/2010 12:14:19 PM 1063 Views
Re: Link? - 27/01/2010 01:38:36 PM 1074 Views
Perhaps we should define our terms more precisely. - 15/02/2010 11:28:09 AM 1457 Views
we do not exist in a free market. - 18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM 841 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM 432 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment. - 18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM 833 Views
No I am not. - 19/01/2010 10:44:31 PM 949 Views
That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM 888 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM 924 Views
civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 18/01/2010 04:49:12 AM 883 Views
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM 1007 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:13:54 AM 884 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 19/01/2010 10:59:45 PM 872 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM 1046 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 20/01/2010 01:38:37 AM 810 Views
Are you at all surprised? - 18/01/2010 07:59:30 AM 894 Views
A truly free country means I don't have the freedom to shoot you - 18/01/2010 05:57:44 AM 1005 Views
You really said nothing, right there. - 18/01/2010 08:34:33 AM 934 Views
I presume you are equally against the current set up - 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM 984 Views
He said as much in his response to me above. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:37:49 PM 366 Views
That's such an amusing argument - 18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM 851 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM* - 19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM 381 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM* - 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM 369 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta - 21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM 853 Views
I can't help but find it funny - 18/01/2010 12:51:57 PM 840 Views
So... - 18/01/2010 03:39:33 PM 997 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out - 18/01/2010 04:11:05 PM 881 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't - 18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM 980 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM 326 Views
I don't think it was that clear - 18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM 909 Views
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM 941 Views
I wasn't taking sides - 18/01/2010 10:57:39 PM 837 Views

Reply to Message