Active Users:1149 Time:19/12/2024 01:11:03 PM
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either Floffe Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM
She says she walked away from the conversation, that doesn't mean she walked away from the friendship. Her friend may be saying they can't be friends if they don't agree but that is not how I read it. May I misread but rereading it I still don’t see anywhere it says her friends is refusing to continue the friendship. Now I didn't read every reply to the post so there may have been something there I missed.

I think that's why Aisha put the "may" in the topic, they had this conversation which her friend walked out of, and haven't sorted it out yet. But still, it was not Aisha who walked out. In fact, up on top she stated she was fine with her friend believing she'd go to hell since she doesn't believe in Jesus as her personal saviour.

Friends can have falling outs and still remain friends. Friends can also disagree on politics and religion.

Exactly, and from this post it certainly seems her friend has more of a problem with it that Aisha does.
--- signature starts here ---

I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!

e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Reply to message
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage - 17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM 1403 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part - 17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM 711 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin. - 17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM 720 Views
God your a moron. - 17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM 659 Views
be nice - 18/01/2010 06:26:58 AM 572 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like - 18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM 623 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM 633 Views
Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 585 Views
It is, I believe, hardest for the intelligent educated man. - 21/01/2010 10:29:39 AM 712 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM 609 Views
LOL... *NM* - 18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM 338 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive. - 18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM 536 Views
why do you imply "constructive" is in anyway the intent? *NM* - 18/01/2010 06:32:27 AM 262 Views
*shrug* I never stopped believing in lost causes? - 18/01/2010 07:36:04 AM 523 Views
Re: You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 18/01/2010 06:28:41 AM 665 Views
Always welcome. - 18/01/2010 07:31:27 AM 761 Views
We finally converted you - 17/01/2010 08:43:25 PM 547 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM* - 17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM 409 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM* - 17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM 268 Views
seriously. *NM* - 17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM 228 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM* - 19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM 297 Views
yeah no kidding - 18/01/2010 06:30:45 AM 536 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate. - 18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM 702 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care? - 18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM 535 Views
Correct - 18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM 620 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments, - 18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM 612 Views
Thank you. - 20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM 761 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me. - 21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM 621 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about? - 27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM 501 Views
Link? - 27/01/2010 09:28:22 AM 591 Views
I can't find a link to the exact quote - 27/01/2010 12:14:19 PM 709 Views
Re: Link? - 27/01/2010 01:38:36 PM 729 Views
Perhaps we should define our terms more precisely. - 15/02/2010 11:28:09 AM 1090 Views
we do not exist in a free market. - 18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM 542 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM 276 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment. - 18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM 498 Views
No I am not. - 19/01/2010 10:44:31 PM 620 Views
That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM 573 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM 593 Views
civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 18/01/2010 04:49:12 AM 571 Views
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM 629 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:13:54 AM 575 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 19/01/2010 10:59:45 PM 544 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM 662 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 20/01/2010 01:38:37 AM 458 Views
Are you at all surprised? - 18/01/2010 07:59:30 AM 568 Views
A truly free country means I don't have the freedom to shoot you - 18/01/2010 05:57:44 AM 652 Views
You really said nothing, right there. - 18/01/2010 08:34:33 AM 606 Views
I presume you are equally against the current set up - 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM 648 Views
He said as much in his response to me above. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:37:49 PM 224 Views
That's such an amusing argument - 18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM 536 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM* - 19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM 234 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM* - 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM 213 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta - 21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM 488 Views
I can't help but find it funny - 18/01/2010 12:51:57 PM 506 Views
So... - 18/01/2010 03:39:33 PM 637 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out - 18/01/2010 04:11:05 PM 532 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't - 18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM 645 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM 206 Views
I don't think it was that clear - 18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM 557 Views
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM 599 Views
I wasn't taking sides - 18/01/2010 10:57:39 PM 473 Views

Reply to Message