I presume you are equally against the current set up
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM
You are not wrong about your distinction between civil & religious weddings. However, same-sex marriage forces others to treat unions to which they are personally opposed as legitimate. For example, nothing stops an employer from extending his health benefits to his exployees' same-sex partner if he chooses, and the free market means that employers who do such things have an advantage in trying to attract employees who would be interested (and for the Christians, the right of an employer to spend his money as he pleases in such a manner is supported by the Gospels, so this should not be an issue) in this benefit. Meanwhile those who oppose it are free to withhold such recognition and also free to accept the consequences of losing employees who dislike such a policy. The point is, everyone is free to act according to his or her beliefs. Not so if same-sex marriage is legalized. Now everyone must accept same-sex marriage under threat of force, even if it violates their conscience or religion. By trying to get legal recognition for same-sex marriage, it supporters aer the ones trying to ram THEIR ideology down everyone's throat!
After all, it is forcing the same situation you oppose on, for example, a gay employer who is against hetrosexual marriage. It is, after all, supporters of hetrosexual marriage that are currently actually the ones ramming THEIR ideology down everyone's throat!
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage
- 17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM
1735 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part
- 17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM
1058 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin.
- 17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM
1057 Views
God your a moron.
- 17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM
995 Views
That was remarkably unconstructive.
- 18/01/2010 12:13:45 AM
851 Views
youll have to excuse Adam, he is a Heathen, its not his fault
*NM*
- 18/01/2010 06:26:34 AM
408 Views
*NM*
- 18/01/2010 06:26:34 AM
408 Views
Ad hominems w/o substance are never excusable, especially in one who knows beter: They're forfeits.
- 18/01/2010 06:39:33 AM
883 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like
- 18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM
1002 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else.
- 18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM
959 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument.
- 17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM
956 Views
LOL... *NM*
- 18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM
526 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive.
- 18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM
849 Views
First, I'm nothing at all like Adam.
- 18/01/2010 06:33:54 AM
920 Views
I was similarly unclear what prompted the comments, but I only needed you to elaborate a little.
- 18/01/2010 07:37:43 AM
1008 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM*
- 17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM
562 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM*
- 17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM
434 Views
seriously. *NM*
- 17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM
384 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM*
- 19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM
479 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate.
- 18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM
1091 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care?
- 18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM
861 Views
Correct
- 18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM
945 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments,
- 18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM
935 Views
Thank you.
- 20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM
1107 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me.
- 21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM
991 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about?
- 27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM
837 Views
we do not exist in a free market.
- 18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM
835 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM*
- 18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM
430 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment.
- 18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM
826 Views
That's utter nonsense.
- 18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM
881 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
- 18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM
916 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
- 18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM
1038 Views
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
- 18/01/2010 07:49:27 AM
914 Views
- 18/01/2010 07:49:27 AM
914 Views
I really dont like the idea of a black person marrying a white person
- 18/01/2010 06:36:26 AM
975 Views
I presume you are equally against the current set up
- 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM
977 Views
That's such an amusing argument
- 18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM
843 Views
And you're fairly appalling in either pretending to misunderstand free markets or in your stupidity
- 27/01/2010 03:00:21 AM
1071 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM*
- 19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM
379 Views
cannoli is a pastry
*NM*
- 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM
367 Views
*NM*
- 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM
367 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta
- 21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM
846 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't
- 18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM
973 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM*
- 18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM
324 Views
I don't think it was that clear
- 18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM
903 Views

