I was similarly unclear what prompted the comments, but I only needed you to elaborate a little.
Joel Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 07:37:43 AM
Second,
I didn't even read what you wrote past: "you can't use logic in an irrational argument"
It just struck me as funny. I mean, YOU saying that.. was funny.
So, take it back.
I didn't even read what you wrote past: "you can't use logic in an irrational argument"
It just struck me as funny. I mean, YOU saying that.. was funny.
So, take it back.
I found THAT a little ironic; it was hard to tell WHAT you meant from three letters, but, no, not really the same; you didn't criticize me personally, and you did address my arguments, I just needed a little clarification. Think about it: I write a book, someone replies with three letters; which chapter prompted them...? ) But, yeah, I know what I said, and meant it the way you heard: It's perfectly OK to have an emotional argument in emotional terms, but logic has about as much place there as a matador. Sometimes I talk in terms of emotion, and others in terms of logic (unless I or someone I care about a lot is personally involved it's more often the latter than the former, I believe; when you've seen me fly off the handle, how often has it been during a dispassionate debating club meeting...? ) Either is fine, IMHO, but "don't bring a knife to a gun fight. "
Aisha is trying, or so it seems to me, to reason with someone going with their gut, and it can't be done. To resolve the impasse I think she's going to have to either start talking in emotional terms or convince her friend to discuss it rationally. There's nothing wrong with agreeing to disagree either, I just hope her friend can see that.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage
17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM
- 1401 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part
17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM
- 710 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin.
17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM
- 719 Views
God your a moron.
17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM
- 658 Views
That was remarkably unconstructive.
18/01/2010 12:13:45 AM
- 532 Views
youll have to excuse Adam, he is a Heathen, its not his fault *NM*
18/01/2010 06:26:34 AM
- 257 Views
Ad hominems w/o substance are never excusable, especially in one who knows beter: They're forfeits.
18/01/2010 06:39:33 AM
- 556 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like
18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM
- 623 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else.
18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM
- 632 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument.
17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM
- 609 Views
LOL... *NM*
18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM
- 338 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive.
18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM
- 535 Views
First, I'm nothing at all like Adam.
18/01/2010 06:33:54 AM
- 598 Views
I was similarly unclear what prompted the comments, but I only needed you to elaborate a little.
18/01/2010 07:37:43 AM
- 699 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM*
17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM
- 409 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM*
17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM
- 268 Views
seriously. *NM*
17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM
- 228 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM*
19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM
- 297 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate.
18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM
- 702 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care?
18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM
- 535 Views
Correct
18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM
- 618 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments,
18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM
- 611 Views
Thank you.
20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM
- 761 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me.
21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM
- 621 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about?
27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM
- 500 Views
we do not exist in a free market.
18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM
- 542 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM*
18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM
- 276 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment.
18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM
- 496 Views
That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM
- 572 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM
- 593 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM
- 661 Views
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
18/01/2010 07:49:27 AM
- 566 Views
I really dont like the idea of a black person marrying a white person
18/01/2010 06:36:26 AM
- 647 Views
That's such an amusing argument
18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM
- 536 Views
And you're fairly appalling in either pretending to misunderstand free markets or in your stupidity
27/01/2010 03:00:21 AM
- 729 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM*
19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM
- 234 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM*
19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM
- 213 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta
21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM
- 487 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't
18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM
- 643 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM*
18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM
- 206 Views
I don't think it was that clear
18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM
- 557 Views