You are not wrong about your distinction between civil & religious weddings. However, same-sex marriage forces others to treat unions to which they are personally opposed as legitimate. For example, nothing stops an employer from extending his health benefits to his exployees' same-sex partner if he chooses, and the free market means that employers who do such things have an advantage in trying to attract employees who would be interested (and for the Christians, the right of an employer to spend his money as he pleases in such a manner is supported by the Gospels, so this should not be an issue) in this benefit. Meanwhile those who oppose it are free to withhold such recognition and also free to accept the consequences of losing employees who dislike such a policy. The point is, everyone is free to act according to his or her beliefs. Not so if same-sex marriage is legalized. Now everyone must accept same-sex marriage under threat of force, even if it violates their conscience or religion. By trying to get legal recognition for same-sex marriage, it supporters aer the ones trying to ram THEIR ideology down everyone's throat!
It forces them to treat same-sex unions as existent, just like heterosexual marriages, and that's it. Many of the devout religious view any "civil" marriage, i.e. a union that was not sanctified by a church, as illegitimate, but that's their religious preference and not something they get to legislate via the government.
Also, your attempt to justify governing with religious preference through free-market rhetoric is just pathetic.
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage
17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM
- 1403 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part
17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM
- 711 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin.
17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM
- 720 Views
God your a moron.
17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM
- 659 Views
That was remarkably unconstructive.
18/01/2010 12:13:45 AM
- 532 Views
youll have to excuse Adam, he is a Heathen, its not his fault *NM*
18/01/2010 06:26:34 AM
- 257 Views
Ad hominems w/o substance are never excusable, especially in one who knows beter: They're forfeits.
18/01/2010 06:39:33 AM
- 557 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like
18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM
- 623 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else.
18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM
- 633 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument.
17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM
- 609 Views
LOL... *NM*
18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM
- 338 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive.
18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM
- 536 Views
First, I'm nothing at all like Adam.
18/01/2010 06:33:54 AM
- 600 Views
I was similarly unclear what prompted the comments, but I only needed you to elaborate a little.
18/01/2010 07:37:43 AM
- 700 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM*
17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM
- 409 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM*
17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM
- 268 Views
seriously. *NM*
17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM
- 228 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM*
19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM
- 297 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate.
18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM
- 702 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care?
18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM
- 535 Views
Correct
18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM
- 620 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments,
18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM
- 613 Views
Thank you.
20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM
- 762 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me.
21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM
- 621 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about?
27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM
- 501 Views
we do not exist in a free market.
18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM
- 542 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM*
18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM
- 276 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment.
18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM
- 498 Views
That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM
- 574 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM
- 593 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense.
18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM
- 662 Views
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
18/01/2010 07:49:27 AM
- 566 Views
I really dont like the idea of a black person marrying a white person
18/01/2010 06:36:26 AM
- 647 Views
That's such an amusing argument
18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM
- 536 Views
And you're fairly appalling in either pretending to misunderstand free markets or in your stupidity
27/01/2010 03:00:21 AM
- 731 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM*
19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM
- 234 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM*
19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM
- 213 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta
21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM
- 488 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't
18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM
- 645 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM*
18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM
- 206 Views
I don't think it was that clear
18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM
- 557 Views