1) Football is ultimately about money. Flashy plays put paying fans in seats. Defense wins championships, but offense sells tickets. Blow another team out, and your team's name will be the one talked about around the water cooler.
2) Calling a risky play when you're far ahead is a safe way to practice it in a live game. The Vikings may enter a situation in the upcoming weeks where they NEED to call that play. Having already done so under pressure will give the team confidence, and increase the likelihood of success.
3) This one is an opinion, but, to me, not trying to score is a lot more embarrassing than putting another few points on the board. Losing sucks, but when a team throws in the towel, it's just plain demeaning. At least when an opponent is still playing the game, you can try to redeem yourself with some flashy play of your own, even if it won't win the thing for you. Once they've called off the dogs, though, there's nothing you can do. If you do something great, no one cares, because the other team isn't playing. If someone's going to beat me, then just do it already. Don't patronize me, worrying about running up the score.
Anyway. In summary, I don't agree that putting more points on the board is disrespectful. Even if it is, I think that making the fans happy and gaining valuable play experience justifies the action. Obviously a coach has to weigh those benefits against the possibility of injuring a player, but that's his call. If he wants to do it, I think he has perfectly justifiable reasons to support his decision.
2) Calling a risky play when you're far ahead is a safe way to practice it in a live game. The Vikings may enter a situation in the upcoming weeks where they NEED to call that play. Having already done so under pressure will give the team confidence, and increase the likelihood of success.
3) This one is an opinion, but, to me, not trying to score is a lot more embarrassing than putting another few points on the board. Losing sucks, but when a team throws in the towel, it's just plain demeaning. At least when an opponent is still playing the game, you can try to redeem yourself with some flashy play of your own, even if it won't win the thing for you. Once they've called off the dogs, though, there's nothing you can do. If you do something great, no one cares, because the other team isn't playing. If someone's going to beat me, then just do it already. Don't patronize me, worrying about running up the score.
Anyway. In summary, I don't agree that putting more points on the board is disrespectful. Even if it is, I think that making the fans happy and gaining valuable play experience justifies the action. Obviously a coach has to weigh those benefits against the possibility of injuring a player, but that's his call. If he wants to do it, I think he has perfectly justifiable reasons to support his decision.
For the Record, I Think Terry Was Right, not Jimmy.
18/01/2010 12:52:27 AM
- 875 Views
There is no running up the score in pro sports.
18/01/2010 01:24:24 AM
- 652 Views
Sure there is.
18/01/2010 01:59:16 AM
- 561 Views
Three reasons I disagree.
18/01/2010 03:39:09 AM
- 560 Views
I find it difficult to feel bad for a team of millionaires...
18/01/2010 01:52:57 AM
- 609 Views
It's less that I feel bad for the Cowboys (and more their fans) than I'm disappointed in the Vikes
18/01/2010 02:56:11 AM
- 587 Views
Wade Phillips should be thanking his lucky stars that the Redskins were so bad this year....
18/01/2010 04:57:32 AM
- 530 Views
It was stupid but they have the right to score if they want
18/01/2010 02:24:39 AM
- 566 Views
Less time than I remembered, underscoring the point.
18/01/2010 02:32:00 AM
- 618 Views
Naw I hope the Saints kick the snot out of them
18/01/2010 03:54:55 AM
- 683 Views
Favre got his ass kicking in '97; I just wish I had it on tape.
18/01/2010 04:38:54 AM
- 703 Views
two reasons you are wrong
18/01/2010 06:02:40 AM
- 577 Views
So it's OK to humiliate a good team, just not a horrible one?
18/01/2010 06:34:24 AM
- 599 Views
eh?
18/01/2010 07:11:25 AM
- 559 Views
The Catch didn't make up 32 points, and The Comeback took more than the two minute warning.
18/01/2010 08:12:54 AM
- 573 Views
um, not to put words in your mouth, but....
18/01/2010 03:48:55 PM
- 569 Views
If you think they're still in it, ice it with the FG; if you don't, kneel down and go home.
18/01/2010 05:48:19 PM
- 759 Views
Hey, if a team can run up the score against you, you shouldn't be in the playoffs.
18/01/2010 01:32:30 PM
- 602 Views
great argument to bad it is based more on your emtions then reality
18/01/2010 02:09:13 PM
- 621 Views
pot meet kettle... *NM*
18/01/2010 04:05:47 PM
- 250 Views
hello kettle
18/01/2010 04:19:49 PM
- 566 Views
the problem being that you're criticizing someone for being emotional while doing the same
18/01/2010 04:42:09 PM
- 588 Views
speaking of sandy vaginas
18/01/2010 05:43:04 PM
- 541 Views
that was so incomprehensible i'm not sure how to respond....
18/01/2010 11:19:38 PM
- 621 Views
To be fair, some, though not all, of Dallas' critics take unconcealed glee in their misfortunes.
19/01/2010 12:49:35 AM
- 583 Views
I have no problem with the critisim
20/01/2010 06:56:38 PM
- 537 Views
When I'm criticizing Romo I'm really criticizing Jerry.
20/01/2010 11:51:50 PM
- 590 Views
For all of the boot Wade talk most people forget he is one of winning coaches in NFL
21/01/2010 05:10:50 AM
- 494 Views
His playoff record is wretched though, so every time he loses a playoff game someone will mention it
21/01/2010 02:10:58 PM
- 537 Views
You must think Barry Switzer is one the greatest coaches of all time then he is 5 of 7 post season
21/01/2010 04:28:29 PM
- 624 Views
Barry wasn't an NFL head coach, he was a placeholding yes man.
22/01/2010 06:56:43 AM
- 666 Views
No sorry either a coach is responsible for his teams record or he isn't
22/01/2010 04:39:09 PM
- 584 Views
I was saying stop winning because I call people out for stupid hate post
20/01/2010 02:38:46 PM
- 552 Views
Re: great argument to bad it is based more on your emtions then reality
18/01/2010 04:43:23 PM
- 604 Views
Re: great argument to bad it is based more on your emtions then reality
18/01/2010 06:57:47 PM
- 592 Views
They were within their rights, just as the Saints would be to do it to them.
18/01/2010 05:57:01 PM
- 547 Views
Re: They were within their rights, just as the Saints would be to do it to them.
18/01/2010 06:56:15 PM
- 511 Views
Re: Hey, if a team can run up the score against you, you shouldn't be in the playoffs.
18/01/2010 06:50:06 PM
- 633 Views
Re: Hey, if a team can run up the score against you, you shouldn't be in the playoffs.
18/01/2010 07:00:18 PM
- 538 Views
I had no problem with it.
19/01/2010 05:32:19 PM
- 550 Views
Seems it's just me, Brooking and Bradshaw on this one.
20/01/2010 09:28:03 AM
- 583 Views
What should happen...
20/01/2010 05:24:45 PM
- 585 Views
Wasn't Childress trying to bench Favre to protect him at the end fo the season...?
21/01/2010 02:20:30 AM
- 597 Views

Your glass are a little rose colored when you look at the Landry years
21/01/2010 03:16:48 PM
- 546 Views
Schramm marketed the hell out of them, yes, but Landry and the players made it credible.
22/01/2010 04:55:01 AM
- 610 Views
I think you confuse the press with the team
20/01/2010 02:55:53 PM
- 500 Views
It's not about "Can" or "Having the Right" or whether or not the Cowboys "should" stop them...
20/01/2010 04:43:36 PM
- 567 Views
"Character is who you are in the dark. "
20/01/2010 11:13:28 PM
- 615 Views