Active Users:678 Time:25/11/2024 12:58:03 PM
While I agree that companies have no legal "obligation to help the general public"... Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 08/01/2010 03:33:58 PM
This week the New York Times reported a disheartening story about two of the largest retail chains. You see, instead of taking unsold items to sample sales or donating them to people in need, H&M and Wal-Mart have been throwing them out in giant trash bags. And in the case that someone may stumble on these bags and try to keep or re-sell the items, these companies have gone ahead and slashed up garments, cut off the sleeves of coats, and sliced holes in shoes so they are unwearable.

This unsettling discovery was made by graduate student Cynthia Magnus outside the back entrance of H&M on 35th street in New York City. Just a few doors down, she also found hundreds of Wal-Mart tagged items with holes made in them that were dumped by a contractor. On December 7, she spotted 20 bags of clothing outside of H&M including, "gloves with the fingers cut off, warm socks, cute patent leather Mary Jane school shoes, maybe for fourth graders, with the instep cut up with a scissor, men’s jackets, slashed across the body and the arms. The puffy fiber fill was coming out in big white cotton balls.”

The New York Times points out that one-third of the city's population is poor, which makes this behavior not only wasteful and sad, but downright irresponsible. Wal-Mart spokeswoman, Melissa Hill, acted surprised that these items were found, claiming they typically donate all unworn merchandise to charity. When reporters went around the corner from H&M to a collections drop-off for charity organization New York Cares, spokesperson Colleen Farrell said, “We’d be glad to take unworn coats, and companies often send them to us."

After several days of no response from H&M, the company made a statement today, promising to stop destroying the garments at the midtown Manhattan location. They said they will donate the items to charity. H&M spokeswoman Nicole Christie said, "It will not happen again," and that the company would make sure none of the other locations would do so either. Hopefully that's the final word.


This sort of thing annoys me. Not what H&M and Wal-Mart did, I think its their right to do this, but that everyone has a problem with it. Would it be nice for Wal-Mart and H&M to donate the clothes to charity? Hell yeah, it would. Are they obligated to? No they are not nor should they be. It is their product. It is their right to dispose of unsold goods as they see fit. They should probably do a better job of it than they did, but still.

I'm not a Wal-Mart fan by any stretch of the imagination but this is them being unfairly judged. Companies do not have an obligation to help the general public.


They have a moral obligation. And these companies do help the general public in other (perhaps less public) ways.

Furthermore, all actions have consequences. Completely forseeable consequences in this case. I fully understand the reaction of the public to this, and don't blame anybody for being upset at the waste. There were other, better, cheaper ways to accomplish the companies' goals in this situation, and hopefully the resulting public outrage will guide them to those better solutions in the future.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
H&M and Wal-Mart destroy and trash unsold goods - 08/01/2010 02:26:56 PM 620 Views
I agree with you. However - 08/01/2010 02:53:56 PM 462 Views
While I agree that companies have no legal "obligation to help the general public"... - 08/01/2010 03:33:58 PM 494 Views
Without more info it's hard to make a judgement - 08/01/2010 05:33:40 PM 448 Views
They have a legal right to dump, but I have a right to judge them as well - 08/01/2010 06:11:52 PM 376 Views
Fiduciary duty to shareholders, plain and simple. *NM* - 08/01/2010 07:21:09 PM 160 Views

Reply to Message