Active Users:397 Time:26/10/2025 05:36:34 AM
I would say it is a bit reactionary but i guess it depends on your definition of intolerance random thoughts Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 03:39:48 PM

It isn't hard to argue that the law shows intolerance. It denies a particular group the right to build certain structure they consider important. I just don’t think it is all that intolerant though. I think any indigenous population has the right to reasonable protection of culture, even if those indigenous people happen to be white Europeans because the reality is they are in much more danger of being culturally over run then the Muslims are.

If the waited until the skyline was dotted with minarets and you could calls to prayer anywhere in the city it would be a little late to put in restrictions.
Reply to message
It seems the Swiss ban on muslim minarets has passed rather quietly - 02/12/2009 04:15:22 PM 605 Views
This is surprising. - 02/12/2009 04:19:03 PM 347 Views
Not here, it certainly hasn't. - 02/12/2009 04:34:55 PM 352 Views
Nor here. It's all over our news. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:01:57 PM 151 Views
I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 05:54:11 PM 357 Views
Re: I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 06:23:09 PM 332 Views
I understand the first in Qatar was built in 2003. - 02/12/2009 10:11:31 PM 313 Views
Yes, with no steeple and no bell! - 03/12/2009 12:48:12 AM 332 Views
Ah yes, now that you mention it. - 03/12/2009 12:52:26 AM 321 Views
see here is what i dont get - 03/12/2009 05:21:10 AM 316 Views
I saw it posted elsewhere - 02/12/2009 06:09:33 PM 307 Views
Does anyone know the legal effect of this referendum? - 02/12/2009 10:00:54 PM 333 Views
It's Switzerland. Their referendums are binding. - 02/12/2009 10:07:52 PM 342 Views
Do the Swiss think they live in 5th-century BC Athens or something? - 02/12/2009 10:11:29 PM 332 Views
Switzerland is odd in a great many ways. - 02/12/2009 10:14:26 PM 343 Views
Actually, I think I meant the European Court of Human Rights, not the ECJ. - 02/12/2009 10:16:38 PM 339 Views
Yeah, but does that one have any power? - 02/12/2009 10:17:54 PM 345 Views
ECHR Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion - 02/12/2009 10:52:35 PM 412 Views
I feel like I'm missing something in this debate - 02/12/2009 11:21:03 PM 300 Views
The latter. - 02/12/2009 11:22:49 PM 339 Views
Huh, that's bizarre - 02/12/2009 11:39:03 PM 319 Views
It's coming from a party... - 02/12/2009 11:42:49 PM 413 Views
sicherheit schaffen, that's great! - 03/12/2009 12:00:00 AM 311 Views
I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 12:05:30 AM 337 Views
Re: I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 02:03:33 AM 322 Views
Thank you, I guess? - 03/12/2009 12:14:08 PM 320 Views
I don't really see a problem with it - 02/12/2009 10:09:55 PM 326 Views
They pretty much have. - 02/12/2009 10:16:46 PM 342 Views
that was kind of my thought - 03/12/2009 12:17:23 AM 303 Views
I would say it is a bit reactionary but i guess it depends on your definition of intolerance - 03/12/2009 03:39:48 PM 350 Views
Several points... - 03/12/2009 07:15:17 PM 339 Views
The Adhan can really get to you - 02/12/2009 11:14:47 PM 402 Views
At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:24:03 PM 335 Views
Re: At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:41:20 PM 328 Views
just wanted to say high - 03/12/2009 03:37:45 PM 325 Views
I think it seems kind of a silly waste of government power... - 03/12/2009 12:27:29 AM 321 Views
It's not the government that did it. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:29:35 AM 153 Views
*re reads* Oh. I guess it's really power to the people over there - 03/12/2009 12:35:59 AM 292 Views
Unfortunately, sometimes... *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:15:29 PM 176 Views

Reply to Message