Active Users:1457 Time:22/09/2026 12:16:40 AM
I would say it is a bit reactionary but i guess it depends on your definition of intolerance random thoughts Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 03:39:48 PM

It isn't hard to argue that the law shows intolerance. It denies a particular group the right to build certain structure they consider important. I just don’t think it is all that intolerant though. I think any indigenous population has the right to reasonable protection of culture, even if those indigenous people happen to be white Europeans because the reality is they are in much more danger of being culturally over run then the Muslims are.

If the waited until the skyline was dotted with minarets and you could calls to prayer anywhere in the city it would be a little late to put in restrictions.
Reply to message
It seems the Swiss ban on muslim minarets has passed rather quietly - 02/12/2009 04:15:22 PM 720 Views
This is surprising. - 02/12/2009 04:19:03 PM 439 Views
Not here, it certainly hasn't. - 02/12/2009 04:34:55 PM 457 Views
Nor here. It's all over our news. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:01:57 PM 193 Views
I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 05:54:11 PM 444 Views
Re: I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 06:23:09 PM 438 Views
I understand the first in Qatar was built in 2003. - 02/12/2009 10:11:31 PM 406 Views
Yes, with no steeple and no bell! - 03/12/2009 12:48:12 AM 430 Views
Ah yes, now that you mention it. - 03/12/2009 12:52:26 AM 414 Views
see here is what i dont get - 03/12/2009 05:21:10 AM 407 Views
I saw it posted elsewhere - 02/12/2009 06:09:33 PM 404 Views
Does anyone know the legal effect of this referendum? - 02/12/2009 10:00:54 PM 429 Views
It's Switzerland. Their referendums are binding. - 02/12/2009 10:07:52 PM 445 Views
Do the Swiss think they live in 5th-century BC Athens or something? - 02/12/2009 10:11:29 PM 426 Views
Switzerland is odd in a great many ways. - 02/12/2009 10:14:26 PM 441 Views
Actually, I think I meant the European Court of Human Rights, not the ECJ. - 02/12/2009 10:16:38 PM 428 Views
Yeah, but does that one have any power? - 02/12/2009 10:17:54 PM 443 Views
ECHR Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion - 02/12/2009 10:52:35 PM 532 Views
I feel like I'm missing something in this debate - 02/12/2009 11:21:03 PM 388 Views
The latter. - 02/12/2009 11:22:49 PM 435 Views
Huh, that's bizarre - 02/12/2009 11:39:03 PM 416 Views
It's coming from a party... - 02/12/2009 11:42:49 PM 529 Views
sicherheit schaffen, that's great! - 03/12/2009 12:00:00 AM 392 Views
I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 12:05:30 AM 429 Views
Re: I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 02:03:33 AM 423 Views
Thank you, I guess? - 03/12/2009 12:14:08 PM 416 Views
I don't really see a problem with it - 02/12/2009 10:09:55 PM 412 Views
They pretty much have. - 02/12/2009 10:16:46 PM 434 Views
that was kind of my thought - 03/12/2009 12:17:23 AM 398 Views
I would say it is a bit reactionary but i guess it depends on your definition of intolerance - 03/12/2009 03:39:48 PM 444 Views
Several points... - 03/12/2009 07:15:17 PM 434 Views
The Adhan can really get to you - 02/12/2009 11:14:47 PM 502 Views
At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:24:03 PM 435 Views
Re: At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:41:20 PM 421 Views
just wanted to say high - 03/12/2009 03:37:45 PM 434 Views
I think it seems kind of a silly waste of government power... - 03/12/2009 12:27:29 AM 414 Views
It's not the government that did it. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:29:35 AM 195 Views
*re reads* Oh. I guess it's really power to the people over there - 03/12/2009 12:35:59 AM 386 Views
Unfortunately, sometimes... *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:15:29 PM 222 Views

Reply to Message