would you also agree that if a human abuses an animal they should be punished? Or would that be "wrong" to put an animal "above" a man like that?
Or is always not really what you meant?
Or is always not really what you meant?
That depends on the animal and the amount of abuse. I would never send someone to jail for something he does to animals, but of course severe cases should get punished one way or another. Don't get me wrong, I love most animals, but as I said, humans come first, as long as they act reasonably.
What about a person who repeatedly poisons his neighbor's dogs by putting antifreeze in their outdoor water bowls - causing the neighbor to spend over $20,000 in veterinary fees to save them?
This is not a hypothetical situation, and it's one where I really, really think that jail time would be appropriate. As well as compensation for the vet bills, obviously.
I guess we're a bit more jail-happy here anyway, but I'd definitely say that torturing animals rates as a worse crime than, say, getting caught with a few ounces of marijuana.
spacespacesplLupine
saceFormerly known as Clover
Still Paul's friend ♥ and Pippin's mum
spacespacespacespacespacespa*MySmiley*
saceFormerly known as Clover
Still Paul's friend ♥ and Pippin's mum
spacespacespacespacespacespa*MySmiley*
Idiots at Zoos make me feel bad for the animals.
27/11/2009 06:36:01 PM
- 648 Views
By fragmentation bullets do you mean hollow points?
27/11/2009 06:47:59 PM
- 605 Views
Doubt it. Frangible ammunition shatters to spread out. Hollow point expands to make 1 big hole
27/11/2009 07:56:46 PM
- 444 Views
Re: Doubt it. Frangible ammunition shatters to spread out. Hollow point expands to make 1 big hole
27/11/2009 08:26:24 PM
- 500 Views
i know little to nothing about ammunition, but that does not make me a moron.
27/11/2009 09:46:44 PM
- 458 Views
i'm not sure, fragmentation bullets is the term the article used.
27/11/2009 09:56:50 PM
- 433 Views
Re: i'm not sure, fragmentation bullets is the term the article used.
28/11/2009 04:32:37 PM
- 389 Views
What are you saying?
27/11/2009 07:16:52 PM
- 525 Views
I think it's pretty obvious
27/11/2009 08:06:48 PM
- 531 Views
out of curiousity
28/11/2009 02:22:32 AM
- 435 Views
So a situation that is "fun" for a bear but leaves a person dead is better than both surviving?
27/11/2009 07:48:00 PM
- 467 Views
Re: So a situation that is "fun" for a bear but leaves a person dead is better than both surviving?
27/11/2009 07:55:02 PM
- 436 Views
It would have been a real shame if the policeman had "missed" once. *NM*
28/11/2009 04:20:28 AM
- 184 Views