AGW supporters lying about recent climate data.....
trzaska2000 Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 08:02:32 PM
trzaska2000 Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 08:02:32 PM
Are supporters of AGW in panic mode:
Climate Skeptics See 'Smoking Gun' in Researchers' Leaked E-Mails
Friday , November 20, 2009
Hackers broke into the servers at a prominent British climate research center and leaked years worth of e-mail messages onto the Web, including one with a mysterious reference to a plan to "hide the decline" in data about temperatures.
The Internet is abuzz about the leaked data from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (commonly called Hadley CRU), which has acknowledged the leak of 61MB of confidential data.
Climate change skeptics describe the leaked data as a "smoking gun," evidence of collusion among climatologists and manipulation of data to support the widely held view that climate change is caused by the actions of mankind. The files were reportedly released on a Russian file-serve by an anonymous poster calling himself "FOIA."
In an exclusive interview in Investigate magazine's TGIF Edition, Phil Jones, the head of the Hadley CRU, confirmed that the leaked data is real.
"It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago," he told the magazine, noting that the center has yet to contact the police about the data breach.
TGIF Edition asked Jones about the controversial "hide the decline" comment from an e-mail he wrote in 1999. He told the magazine that there was no intention to mislead, but he had "no idea" what he meant by those words.
"That was an e-mail from ten years ago. Can you remember the exact context of what you wrote ten years ago?" he said.
The Telegraph has posted some of the more scathing excerpts from these emails, which the newspaper suggests points to manipulation of evidence and private doubts about the reality of global warming, though the much of the scientific language in the e-mails is esoteric and hard to interpret.
But one notable e-mail clearly describes how to squeeze dissenting scientists from the peer review process:
"I think we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?"
Climate Skeptics See 'Smoking Gun' in Researchers' Leaked E-Mails
Friday , November 20, 2009
Hackers broke into the servers at a prominent British climate research center and leaked years worth of e-mail messages onto the Web, including one with a mysterious reference to a plan to "hide the decline" in data about temperatures.
The Internet is abuzz about the leaked data from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (commonly called Hadley CRU), which has acknowledged the leak of 61MB of confidential data.
Climate change skeptics describe the leaked data as a "smoking gun," evidence of collusion among climatologists and manipulation of data to support the widely held view that climate change is caused by the actions of mankind. The files were reportedly released on a Russian file-serve by an anonymous poster calling himself "FOIA."
In an exclusive interview in Investigate magazine's TGIF Edition, Phil Jones, the head of the Hadley CRU, confirmed that the leaked data is real.
"It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago," he told the magazine, noting that the center has yet to contact the police about the data breach.
TGIF Edition asked Jones about the controversial "hide the decline" comment from an e-mail he wrote in 1999. He told the magazine that there was no intention to mislead, but he had "no idea" what he meant by those words.
"That was an e-mail from ten years ago. Can you remember the exact context of what you wrote ten years ago?" he said.
The Telegraph has posted some of the more scathing excerpts from these emails, which the newspaper suggests points to manipulation of evidence and private doubts about the reality of global warming, though the much of the scientific language in the e-mails is esoteric and hard to interpret.
But one notable e-mail clearly describes how to squeeze dissenting scientists from the peer review process:
"I think we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?"
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by trzaska2000 on 20/11/2009 at 08:12:44 PM
AGW supporters lying about recent climate data.....
- 20/11/2009 08:02:32 PM
525 Views
- 20/11/2009 08:02:32 PM
525 Views
The scientific community has not changed its mind.
- 21/11/2009 12:13:29 AM
363 Views
Tssk, tssk, making assumptions about "my lifestyle".....
- 21/11/2009 12:45:07 AM
337 Views
I made no assumptions about your lifestyle, I was speaking about your ideology. *NM*
- 21/11/2009 11:22:44 PM
132 Views
Then perhaps you should have typed "ideology" instead of "lifestyle"
- 22/11/2009 12:39:23 AM
314 Views
By the way, the "warming has stopped" argument has been throughly refuted.
- 21/11/2009 11:45:25 PM
321 Views
Dude.....global temps have gone down since 1998.....11 years and counting.....pretty simple *NM*
- 22/11/2009 12:34:29 AM
164 Views
Get a clue, there have been breaks before. The trend in the last century is upwards sharply even
- 22/11/2009 10:53:31 PM
311 Views
Last century is a convenient time-period.....just saying 11-years and counting, no increase in temp.
- 23/11/2009 12:38:42 AM
341 Views
yeah, like all the hot air being emitted from the mouths of the conservatives *NM*
- 23/11/2009 06:54:54 PM
144 Views
There are other variables like deforestation which is dramatically fucking the levels of 02 and CO2.
- 25/11/2009 05:14:21 PM
284 Views
Heh, I think you're the only person that uses that smiley. 
*NM*
- 21/11/2009 02:01:41 AM
137 Views
*NM*
- 21/11/2009 02:01:41 AM
137 Views
HA! I love those thumbs up/down smileys! They need to be used more! *NM*
- 22/11/2009 12:40:43 AM
132 Views
A biased article about the illegal hacking of a universties servers release of out of context emails
- 23/11/2009 04:39:22 PM
291 Views