I'm fairly neutral on this score, but coming into power in a country currently embroiled in war is not the same thing as perpetuating war. He would really be an unfit candidate if he had pulled out of either w/o attempts at stabilization.
That said, I don't think that rationalization makes it a good idea. It just gives it a pretty reason.
That said, I don't think that rationalization makes it a good idea. It just gives it a pretty reason.
So, I was discussing Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize with a friend and...
12/10/2009 05:01:38 PM
- 708 Views
I think this was actually the Nobel Committee's rationale, wasn't it?
12/10/2009 05:06:12 PM
- 423 Views
wait. Obama won the peace prize? *NM*
12/10/2009 05:18:12 PM
- 160 Views
He got it for bombing the moon. *NM*
12/10/2009 06:14:10 PM
- 176 Views
I heard it was hiding WMDs. *NM*
12/10/2009 08:18:19 PM
- 173 Views
Well, it wouldn't allow the UN inspectors in so what would you think? *NM*
12/10/2009 08:34:11 PM
- 183 Views
No one currently fighting two wars should win. Ever. *NM*
12/10/2009 08:17:47 PM
- 183 Views
I can't really agree
12/10/2009 09:04:54 PM
- 432 Views
Obama was probably the best available choice
13/10/2009 05:26:26 AM
- 451 Views
Do you have a source for that?
13/10/2009 04:03:47 PM
- 406 Views
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades.
13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM
- 407 Views
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades.
14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM
- 425 Views
If it was "given to the American voters," the I want my share of the prize money.
13/10/2009 04:01:12 PM
- 439 Views