Active Users:1082 Time:22/11/2024 12:58:19 PM
and the foreseeable future Vodalus Send a noteboard - 02/05/2017 08:55:11 PM

View original post
View original postJ Street is poorly financed and organized compared to AIPAC. Moreover, half of them come across as starry-eyed communists with little understanding of how things really work, meaning they fundamentally misunderstand human nature.


View original postYou mean kind of like the nearly half of Democrats who voted for Bernie Sanders? Yeah, their support is to a large extent young and idealistic, but still, American public opinion, and Jewish American public opinion, are more balanced than they used to be.

America's foreign policy in and for the Middle East doesn't really change when a new president comes to power, no matter his party. Permanent government and monied interests see to that. I don't see that changing, not even for some future Sanders-esque president, should one come along.


View original post
View original postI don't know. Seems like Avigdor and even nastier types have the ears of plenty. I do however admit I haven't been following things closely for the last year or two. Also, the reduction of the terrorist threat is, in my mind, something of a byproduct of the general chaos across much of the region. Should things settle down somewhat and any form of political stability emerge, then I imagine Hamas's hardliners getting outside "help".


View original postLieberman has his moments of surprising reasonableness, and then the other moments. Part of that is his secularism and less doctrinal - but not less vehement - positions on the conflict and how to solve it. And part of it is just Naftali Bennett who makes both Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu look reasonable.


View original postNot sure about your second point - it all depends on what the new regional political landscape will look like. At the moment, at least, the absolutist Sunni front of Saudi Arabia and its allies is dominating, and they hate the Muslim Brotherhood which Hamas remains to some extent associated with. As well as the Shi'ites who have provided support to Hamas in the past.




View original postMost of the regular political posters here are more in favour of Israel's policies and loathe Hamas - so was expecting to have to criticize the former and defend the latter. To the limited extent that I'm willing to do that, anyway.

I'm more or less sick of both sides. I'd like for the US to wash its hands of the two.
南無阿弥陀仏!
Reply to message
Why Now Is the Time to Talk to Hamas - 02/05/2017 06:30:35 PM 1063 Views
Since Eretz Israel is still Likud's aim, and AIPAC has turned Capitol Hill into another... - 02/05/2017 07:22:09 PM 589 Views
There's more to Israel than Likud - and more to Capitol Hill than AIPAC. - 02/05/2017 07:37:11 PM 699 Views
But it's the Likudniks, in both countries, who have such an outsized say in matters... - 02/05/2017 08:07:11 PM 581 Views
For now. - 02/05/2017 08:31:25 PM 654 Views
and the foreseeable future - 02/05/2017 08:55:11 PM 579 Views
I bite my tongue - 02/05/2017 09:27:07 PM 602 Views
Hamas is still considered a terrorist group by the US and the EU. - 02/05/2017 08:21:47 PM 629 Views
See, that's the kind of reply I was expecting. - 02/05/2017 08:59:41 PM 688 Views
Oh, I'd still talk to them. I just don't expect anything positive will occur with them. - 02/05/2017 09:38:47 PM 579 Views
Fair enough. *NM* - 02/05/2017 10:34:39 PM 343 Views
Depends on if you believe them or not - 02/05/2017 08:38:19 PM 583 Views
What else can one expect from the Guardian? - 03/05/2017 03:26:08 AM 705 Views
where people wipe their ass with their left hand *NM* - 03/05/2017 03:51:42 AM 468 Views
Unless ISIS chopped it off - 03/05/2017 05:45:09 AM 600 Views
Talk. Exterminate. Either or really. *NM* - 03/05/2017 07:27:33 AM 279 Views
The Guardian really can't be taken seriously - 03/05/2017 03:10:24 PM 805 Views
Fuck the Guardian. Who is supposed to talk with Hamas ? - 03/05/2017 04:11:01 PM 585 Views

Reply to Message