...due to deep pockets.
View original postThere's J Street, for one, and the dawning realization in AIPAC circles that they are losing young American Jews at a pretty scary rate, along with young Americans of most other backgrounds - at least, 'losing' in the sense that they won't just go along with whatever AIPAC says and will look more critically at Israel's actions before deciding whether they support it.
J Street is poorly financed and organized compared to AIPAC. Moreover, half of them come across as starry-eyed communists with little understanding of how things really work, meaning they fundamentally misunderstand human nature.
View original postAs for Israel, the funny thing is that the Likudnik are looking like the moderates sometimes... especially people like the president. But there's still a majority of the Israeli public which is reasonable on that topic, they're just not very focused on the conflict anymore. Which is understandable enough in many ways - and it's good news too, to the extent that it's due to greater security from terrorist attacks. Obviously not so helpful when it comes to pushing through the painful concessions that real lasting peace would require on the Israeli side as well.
I don't know. Seems like Avigdor and even nastier types have the ears of plenty. I do however admit I haven't been following things closely for the last year or two. Also, the reduction of the terrorist threat is, in my mind, something of a byproduct of the general chaos across much of the region. Should things settle down somewhat and any form of political stability emerge, then I imagine Hamas's hardliners getting outside "help".
View original postIt's funny, I didn't expect my first reply in this thread to be quite like this...
How so?