Active Users:1215 Time:22/11/2024 08:36:25 PM
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject Roland00 Send a noteboard - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM

You do know the sexual harassment claims go back 15 years back to 2002

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/a-timeline-of-bill-oreillys-vileness-w477663

Personally though as much as sexual harassment is evil and vile personally what I find more offensive is the Bill O'Reilly used to be married to Maureen McPhilmy. They had a nasty divorce from 2010 to 2011 and afterwards 5 years of custody battles from 2010 to 2015 over their 2 children. During this custody battle Bill O Reilly and his ex-wife hired the neutral therapist who was supposed to be there for the children, Bill O Reilly then hired this neutral therapist as a nanny without telling his ex wife and was paying her a six figure sallary and O'Reilly attorney agreed that this happened factually.

During this divorce and after the divorce Bill O'Reilly started an internal affairs investigation on his Ex-Wife's boyfriend who was a police officer. Note the ex-wife of Bill O'Reilly later married this cop. Then 3 years after the Divorce, Bill O'Reilly told the catholic church in writting that his ex-wife was receiving communion even though she was divorced and was living in sin and this led to a reprimand letter being sent to his wife. I do not know if you are catholic but this is a extremely big deal according to canon law 915 and 916.

Oh during the 5 year custody battle the then 16 year old daughter of Bill and his Ex Wife testified to a court forensic officer that her father choked and dragged her mother via the neck during a physical altercation several years earlier during the divorce. In other words the daughter who still sees her father during visitations every two weeks just in front of the court accused her dad of domestic violence.

All this is factual evidence of the court case between Bill O'Reilly and his ex wife. Court case that lasted several years and do not end. Bill O Reilly is now sueing his ex wife again for 10 million plus dollars (and then expanding it) saying she was not faithful in the marriage.

This is Roland00 personal opinion You see 5 years of court cases are not enough, we need to continue the process and make it 7 years and I need to make my ex wife pay via making her life miserable for she divorced me and instead of ending the conflict and burying the hatchet the only way to end is my victory.

I, Roland00, have no clue whether Bill O'Reilly did sexual harassment and I do not care. In the early and mid 2000s I used to listen to Bill O'Reilly's show but after learning this type of bullshit a man does to his family I want nothing to do with him for he is an asshole and a vile human being. I understand these types of BS due to similar situations with my mother and father.

As for me, Roland00 speculating why people do things in 2016 and 2017 involving the sexual harassment case and whether it is censorship or not I do not care. You can speculate on the motives of liberals all you want. All I can tell you is this man is vile, and you should not waste your time defending him Random Thoughts for surely there are good people in this universe that are a better use of your attention and advocacy. Advocate for veterans, or orphans, or cancer patients, or a balanced federal budget. Do not waste your time on this man for this man is a vindictive jackass and external proxies who are not involved with this BS should not get involved when a person is vindictive and wants to create external pain on other people if we can't effect the outcome.

Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 835 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 592 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 622 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 619 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 562 Views
My guess is 2 - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 534 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 586 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 549 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 551 Views
Horse shit - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 636 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 546 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 531 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 631 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 350 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 542 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 582 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 511 Views
Regarding corporate policy - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 628 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 500 Views
The company isn't stupid - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 564 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 596 Views
Your points are pointless - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 662 Views
We are debating different things - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 534 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 570 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 481 Views
I agree with you - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 523 Views
So??/ - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 580 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 236 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 499 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 567 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 540 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 531 Views
Agreed - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 548 Views
It did have that vibe - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 553 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 523 Views

Reply to Message