Active Users:513 Time:04/03/2026 03:25:28 AM
It only looks that way from the outside. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM

View original post
If BCBS insures 5 different companies (5 groups), each is not priced to be profitable by itself, but such that the overall BCBS profit level is achieved. Groups that cost BCBS more are subsidized by groups that cost them less. This is also true if BCBS has one company in a group and that company has locations in 5 different states. Most insurance companies already have networks of providers in multiple states/locales.

The actual mechanics of the plan are entirely different from the appearance. In your example of a business that operates in 5 states, but has their insurance through BC/BS. The employees in each state are not being covered by the same insurance company, even though it appears so. Underneath BC/BS is BC/BS Alabama, BC/BS Georgia, BC/BS Mississippi, etc. Each of them contracts physicians, and administers health plans that are slightly different in benefits and premiums. All the group plans for a particular state are in the same "risk pool" regardless of the company. In other words, the risk pool isn't the business, but the geographic region.

The major insurance carriers work VERY hard to appear to be a seamless national whole for marketing purposes but appearance is all it is.

Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 971 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 731 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 347 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 386 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 724 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 721 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 623 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 683 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 744 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 688 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 849 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 895 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 751 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 681 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 709 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 653 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 789 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 746 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 687 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 749 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 681 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 692 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 731 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 705 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 715 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 690 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 702 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 753 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 750 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 460 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 768 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 803 Views

Reply to Message