Active Users:1116 Time:23/11/2024 12:49:10 AM
Even the lone unnamed source (i.e. The Guardians) does not corroborate Trumps claim Joel Send a noteboard - 06/03/2017 05:42:32 PM

View original post
View original postEveryone else in a position to know, in not only the previous but the CURRENT administration, has categorically denied it, noting (among other things) that NO FISA warrant for such an action exists nor was ever even sought.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/fbi-granted-fisa-warrant-wiretap-trump-tower-media-claims-provides-no-evidence/

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/01/guardian-fbi-asked-warrant-monitor-trump-aides

Publications from BOTH the left and the right report that there were 2 FISA warrant requests (the first was shockingly denied). heck TRANSCRIPTS of phone calls have been leaked...

You can try and claim that the taps were legal and/or justified, but you can NOT deny that there were taps.


Sure you can, because they WERE NOT: Checking a server in another STATE to see if anyone who WORKED FOR you got illegal ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS from foreign spies is not listening in on every call you make from your office. That is even assuming the anonymous source his/herself is telling the truth on that much.

The "do as I say, not as I do" party strikes again.

The only TRANSCRIPTS OF CALLS that were leaked were taps on RUSSIAN phones, which Flynn called to illegally discuss lifting sanctions when he was just a private citizen and Trump not even president. And yeah, if you call a mafia don there is a good chance the tap on HIS phone will record YOUR conversation with him, but that does not mean anyone tapped YOUR phone, only that you CALLED a criminal, whose phone was justifiably tapped. This whole "I called the KGB and the evil US government recorded it because they tapped all the KGBs phones" schtick is getting old:

Just stop calling mortal US enemies to offer them illegal favors in exchange for rigging the election in YOUR favor and there is no problem.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 06/03/2017 at 05:50:26 PM
Reply to message
Trump wire tapping - 06/03/2017 02:36:15 AM 648 Views
It is an allegation, nothing more; even Trump has not offered ANY evidence - 06/03/2017 03:36:11 AM 781 Views
Ummm, try again - 06/03/2017 02:09:04 PM 618 Views
Even the lone unnamed source (i.e. The Guardians) does not corroborate Trumps claim - 06/03/2017 05:42:32 PM 768 Views
Keep trying - 06/03/2017 06:10:07 PM 488 Views
It is ONE anonymous source, who STILL never said, "phone tap," nor "Trump" - 06/03/2017 06:16:07 PM 648 Views
EVERYTHING for the last year has been anonymous sources... - 06/03/2017 09:49:27 PM 523 Views
anonymous sources are the new facts *NM* - 06/03/2017 09:59:06 PM 239 Views
It's just a baseless charge thrown out there to distract the press. - 06/03/2017 03:54:16 AM 535 Views
Yes and no - 06/03/2017 05:59:26 PM 625 Views
Philosophical question: if Trump isn't front page news, does he really exist? *NM* - 06/03/2017 06:18:19 AM 296 Views
That is when he is most real - 06/03/2017 06:03:11 PM 622 Views
Not far fetched. Obama did something similar to Merkel, did he not ? - 06/03/2017 08:34:40 AM 643 Views
It is not true until the NYT has an unnamed source *NM* - 06/03/2017 11:53:19 AM 290 Views
Actually, the whole thing is from one unnamed Guardian source (who did not say what Trump claims) - 06/03/2017 05:59:41 PM 651 Views
Source? *NM* - 06/03/2017 06:02:21 PM 225 Views
Sure; it is the one I linked in response to HyggaRott - 06/03/2017 06:08:29 PM 721 Views
So says the WP unamed source. And they call that fact checking - 06/03/2017 09:05:09 PM 543 Views
I watch too much "House of Cards".... - 06/03/2017 08:55:52 PM 572 Views

Reply to Message