Active Users:1116 Time:23/11/2024 12:49:09 AM
Comey does new 2nd letter, new e-mails does not change its conclusion from months ago / july. Roland00 Send a noteboard - 06/11/2016 08:52:58 PM

Here is the copy of the letter from CNN reporter Jim Acosta

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/795360000004726784

Edit: Forgot to make the link easier to click

Links to scanned copy of letter
This message last edited by Roland00 on 06/11/2016 at 08:53:25 PM
Reply to message
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM* - 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM 698 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM 549 Views
Nods *NM* - 30/10/2016 04:46:35 PM 244 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook..... - 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM 606 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this - 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM 624 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM* - 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM 351 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM 541 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM 504 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity - 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM 678 Views
This is where you are actually wrong.... - 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM 485 Views
More interesting then anything.... - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM 510 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here - 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM 541 Views
In theory, I agree with you... - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM 530 Views
Re: In theory, I agree with you... - 04/11/2016 06:01:55 PM 528 Views
I do love how, for the Dems, he went from... - 31/10/2016 02:17:42 PM 530 Views
Ewww. *NM* - 04/11/2016 04:06:37 PM 207 Views
she's not under any investigation whatsoever - 31/10/2016 06:00:14 PM 504 Views
Comey does new 2nd letter, new e-mails does not change its conclusion from months ago / july. - 06/11/2016 08:52:58 PM 692 Views

Reply to Message