Active Users:715 Time:08/01/2026 09:42:33 AM
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM

View original post
the blanket statement of "i fher ex husband is carrying ... claddified infomration" being automatically bad is both rampant speculation and a lack of understanding how classified information works. i know you spent time in the military, so i would expect you to know how the "right to know" works where information is concerned.....

Even with a security clearance there are extremely strict regulations regarding what you have to do with and how you handle classified information which is one of the reasons why Hillary is in trouble to begin with. You sure as heck don't get to keep it as a memento after you are booted from office.

You are completely welcome to be a reflex Clinton supporter, but please PLEASE try to come up with better excuses.

Reply to message
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM* - 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM 767 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM 711 Views
Nods *NM* - 30/10/2016 04:46:35 PM 311 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook..... - 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM 772 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this - 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM 786 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM* - 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM 415 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM 707 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM 668 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity - 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM 856 Views
This is where you are actually wrong.... - 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM 625 Views
More interesting then anything.... - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM 662 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here - 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM 717 Views
In theory, I agree with you... - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM 696 Views
Re: In theory, I agree with you... - 04/11/2016 06:01:55 PM 721 Views
I do love how, for the Dems, he went from... - 31/10/2016 02:17:42 PM 679 Views
Ewww. *NM* - 04/11/2016 04:06:37 PM 271 Views
she's not under any investigation whatsoever - 31/10/2016 06:00:14 PM 678 Views

Reply to Message