Where does the Constitution say a woman can't nominate justices, or that there is time limit?
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 20/05/2016 09:14:13 PM
View original post
...since the republicans in the Senate decided they wanted Hillary Clinton to pick the next Supreme Court justice. for a party who claims to want to follow the Constitution to the letter, they sure do ignore large swaths of it when it suits their temper tantrum of the day.
...since the republicans in the Senate decided they wanted Hillary Clinton to pick the next Supreme Court justice. for a party who claims to want to follow the Constitution to the letter, they sure do ignore large swaths of it when it suits their temper tantrum of the day.
The Republicans who have decided that the next justice should be chosen by a president with a more recent electoral mandate, and who will have to answer for his pick when it comes time to run for re-election, would only be hypocritical if they changed their tune once a Democrat was elected. The principle is a valid reason, and they don't any justification other than "Fuck you, I don't like how he parts his hair". The Constitution requires the nominee be confirmed by the legislative branch. It does not say they must approve the nominee MUST be approved under certain circumstances.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Cannoli on 20/05/2016 at 09:19:25 PM
it's been over 90 days....
- 18/05/2016 07:22:55 PM
726 Views
Where does the Constitution say a woman can't nominate justices, or that there is time limit?
- 20/05/2016 09:14:13 PM
457 Views
It has been over 90 days the far left liberals and the media lap dogs started this line of BS
- 23/05/2016 04:49:00 PM
406 Views
This is pretty obviously a "letter of the law, not the spirit" thing
- 31/05/2016 05:35:30 PM
573 Views
It is pretty obvious that they are violating neither the spirt nor the letter
- 31/05/2016 08:24:07 PM
446 Views
You should try to use less buzzwords and rhetoric.
- 02/06/2016 07:17:25 PM
566 Views
You mean like the rhetoric of claiming something is a violation of the Constitution?
- 03/06/2016 05:30:01 PM
415 Views