The whole argument has been a textbook example of how liberals attack anyone for stating a dissenting opinion.
"Oh look," says the left, "this guy has a problem with how terrible we are at fair application of facts."
"Well," says the left, "we'll just ignore his thesis and nitpick his arguments, and try to make him out to be an ignorant and petty person."
I guess the funny thing to me, is that these people think that that is a legitimate debate defense. It's not. If you ignore the whole point, then you have no right to discuss the supporting evidence.
So, to those attacking Cannoli and his point, kindly shut up unless you're actually going to argue about his thesis, which none of you has done.