Active Users:860 Time:23/11/2024 11:03:17 AM
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely moondog Send a noteboard - 10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM

View original post
View original post
witness a species of swallow found in nebraska which has been shown to have a shorter wingspan, thus allowing it to dodge cars more effectively over the course of 30 years. shorter-winged birds managed to survive and breed, and now they don't get splattered by cars nearly as often as they used to. if that isn't rock solid proof that evolutionary theory is perfectly sound and valid, then i don't know what is....

I broke my usual rule of not clicking a moondog link, since they never ever claim support his point, and looked at the article. This is people who want to believe in evolution simply claiming, absent proof, that their god has intervened to save the birds. In fact, it's OUR God who pays attention to their deaths. He said so.

Birds have not changed. The preexisting characteristics of a species has altered in proportion. If snipers started shooting everyone over six feet tall, the proportion of humans under six feet tall in that area would increase. It would not change the characteristics of human biology or, even if all the tall people were eradicated from the breeding pool, and their genes combed out through successive generations, that humans had changed species. People have managed to INTELLIGENTLY DESIGN varieties of dog from Chihuahua to Great Dane, but they are all canis lupus familiaris. Your evolved swallows are still swallows, and when removed from the environment that selects for short wings, their proportions will go right back to normal.

If YOU were familiar with Charles Darwin's work, you would note that this is essentially the exact same phenomenon he observed with the Galapagos finches. Subsequent studies revealed that their beaks revert back to the normal range in different climates. This is not remotely evidence of speciation. It would be an interesting phenomenon to study on its own merit, but not as the basis for a work called "Origin of Species."


yeah that's actually how the process works. since you understand it so well are you just arguing with me because it's me and you are 100% against what i say even when i'm right, or because you think you're actually in disagreement with the principle? if you're in disagreement so much that i'm an idiot for presenting a case exactly as the process you've described, then you are also an idiot for believing that natural selection chooses the birds that are better at surviving the dive out of an overpass without getting hit by cars. and if those birds move to some other place, their bodies will change to be more adapted to the other environment. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE ARTICLE SUGGESTS, AND EVOLUTIONARY THEORY SUPPORTS IS HAPPENING! so either you agree that evolution works as presented, or you don't agree even though you do. should i re-submit it under a different login so that you can read it without automatically filing it under "must disagree because moondog wrote it"?

"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Can liberals all stop their posturing about adhering to science? - 05/06/2015 12:04:13 AM 1216 Views
It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man - 05/06/2015 02:23:34 PM 651 Views
Re: It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man - 05/06/2015 09:05:03 PM 648 Views
It's so difficult to parse out your trolling sometimes - 07/06/2015 02:37:11 PM 626 Views
Some people feel like they are women, though born as men. So they take steps to live - 05/06/2015 04:47:14 PM 638 Views
I agree with you in theory - 05/06/2015 09:43:43 PM 521 Views
I think it's okay to be weirded out by it - 08/06/2015 10:28:02 PM 656 Views
gender issues aside the evidence of evolution is undeniable to the extreme - 05/06/2015 08:37:37 PM 521 Views
Well then why do scientists feel the need to make up their own fake evidence? - 05/06/2015 09:16:40 PM 568 Views
The specifics and our understanding always changes - 05/06/2015 09:50:39 PM 572 Views
"A better fit" doesn't sound much like testable hypotheses and observable data - 06/06/2015 12:38:49 AM 707 Views
Science and absolute, unquestioned fact... - 06/06/2015 11:16:10 AM 582 Views
The theory is refined that is all - 08/06/2015 07:11:40 PM 558 Views
We can find Naederthal DNA in modern humans - 08/06/2015 07:01:01 PM 513 Views
I am 3% Neanderthal! My 23andMe Test told me so!! *NM* - 08/06/2015 08:07:35 PM 319 Views
If thought about doing that - 09/06/2015 02:31:11 PM 521 Views
...I'm confused, are you claiming that no real fossils have been found? - 07/06/2015 02:41:12 PM 541 Views
And they prove what, exactly? - 07/06/2015 11:24:43 PM 643 Views
Er, well yeah, that's the point- Scientific knowledge keeps growing and challenging itself - 08/06/2015 02:58:26 PM 587 Views
It's not at all the same. - 09/06/2015 02:53:06 PM 548 Views
In fact, fossils are not even necessary sometimes -- we can see it over the course of generations - 08/06/2015 09:06:23 PM 565 Views
That's not evolution, idiot. - 09/06/2015 02:31:27 PM 554 Views
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely - 10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM 531 Views
I would not have expected to see you adhere to a scientist position - 07/06/2015 03:06:11 AM 597 Views
I am not; I am criticizing the people who apply it inconsistently - 07/06/2015 11:14:05 PM 638 Views
Perhaps she does not believe in hell - 08/06/2015 12:55:50 PM 456 Views
can republicans stop their posturing about adhering to morality? - 08/06/2015 09:17:16 PM 558 Views
My own homosexual inclinations would not constitute hypocrisy in opposing deviant behavior - 09/06/2015 02:14:56 PM 583 Views
"… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith… speaking lies in hypocrisy…" - 15/06/2015 03:36:08 AM 598 Views
See - more liberal doublespeak - 15/06/2015 03:30:57 PM 563 Views
“Who are you calling, ‘you people’?! - 17/06/2015 10:08:32 AM 505 Views
Some other stuff - 15/06/2015 03:45:59 PM 593 Views
See what you (and the devil, of course) made me do? - 17/06/2015 10:16:35 AM 554 Views
I find this entire discussion absolutely hilarious. - 15/06/2015 04:19:31 PM 469 Views
well I am sucb a died in the wool liberal I just cant help myself - 15/06/2015 06:25:57 PM 432 Views
Yeah, you're to the Left of Trotsky. *NM* - 15/06/2015 07:31:28 PM 272 Views
...what? Attacking points is pretty much what debate IS. - 16/06/2015 04:29:05 AM 495 Views
No... - 17/06/2015 08:00:57 PM 477 Views
OK? - 18/06/2015 04:03:32 AM 512 Views
duplicate post, ignore *NM* - 18/06/2015 04:03:47 AM 344 Views
Oh, I'm sorry. - 18/06/2015 09:05:42 PM 578 Views
A thesis delayed till the SECOND paragraph is, at best, misplaced - 20/06/2015 09:37:36 AM 554 Views
Bah, damn you for good points! - 21/06/2015 09:33:49 PM 570 Views
Oh, man, been there, done that, got the T-shirt - 22/06/2015 01:26:13 AM 494 Views
Heheh, thank you for understanding. - 22/06/2015 09:23:11 PM 484 Views
Re: Oh, I'm sorry. - 20/06/2015 04:44:24 PM 631 Views
You're missing my whole issue with labeling. - 21/06/2015 09:32:36 PM 563 Views
This might be a complete non-sequitur, but... - 21/06/2015 10:38:19 PM 450 Views
I'm a hardcore lurker... - 22/06/2015 09:26:59 PM 402 Views
Cool. - 22/06/2015 10:14:45 PM 502 Views
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU *NM* - 15/06/2015 05:01:30 PM 275 Views

Reply to Message