View original post
If you insist on my adhering to religious revelation and doctrine only, there isn't even a discussion. That poor bastard is going to hell unless he pulls out of his public tailspin.
If you insist on my adhering to religious revelation and doctrine only, there isn't even a discussion. That poor bastard is going to hell unless he pulls out of his public tailspin.
Or believes that being true to herself is what her god would want.
Can liberals all stop their posturing about adhering to science?
05/06/2015 12:04:13 AM
- 1217 Views
It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man
05/06/2015 02:23:34 PM
- 652 Views
Some people feel like they are women, though born as men. So they take steps to live
05/06/2015 04:47:14 PM
- 638 Views
The issue is science, and you respond with ...feelings? The point called, and it misses you too.
05/06/2015 09:31:09 PM
- 666 Views
Are you seriously claiming your post is motivated by science?
05/06/2015 10:39:01 PM
- 520 Views
No, by hypocrites citing science as a trump card when it suits them & ignoring it on other issues
06/06/2015 12:33:53 AM
- 641 Views
If you want to accuse liberals of ignoring science there so many better examples
09/06/2015 04:35:58 PM
- 642 Views
gender issues aside the evidence of evolution is undeniable to the extreme
05/06/2015 08:37:37 PM
- 521 Views
Well then why do scientists feel the need to make up their own fake evidence?
05/06/2015 09:16:40 PM
- 569 Views
The specifics and our understanding always changes
05/06/2015 09:50:39 PM
- 573 Views
"A better fit" doesn't sound much like testable hypotheses and observable data
06/06/2015 12:38:49 AM
- 708 Views
Science and absolute, unquestioned fact...
06/06/2015 11:16:10 AM
- 584 Views
The theory is refined that is all
08/06/2015 07:11:40 PM
- 559 Views
Refined is probably a better word for it (though some can be overturned)
09/06/2015 08:47:22 AM
- 549 Views
We can find Naederthal DNA in modern humans
08/06/2015 07:01:01 PM
- 513 Views
We share 1/3 of the DNA of flowers. Where are those in our ancestral tree?
09/06/2015 02:20:46 PM
- 547 Views
Americas (Christian?!) "accepted religious standards" can and have been changed to vindicate robbers
15/06/2015 03:37:12 AM
- 527 Views
So? My point is that liberals would not allow you to teach that in a public school
15/06/2015 01:43:43 PM
- 458 Views
Liberals consistently teach that in schools, despite conservatives calling it “revisionist history”
17/06/2015 10:00:48 AM
- 573 Views
The problem with the "there can not spontanous life" argument is
15/06/2015 02:29:06 PM
- 503 Views
"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
17/06/2015 10:02:00 AM
- 529 Views
will since omnipotent beings are ut side the realm of the possible we can eliminate that
17/06/2015 05:45:36 PM
- 583 Views
Who says omnipotent beings are outside the realm of possibility?
20/06/2015 03:59:44 AM
- 645 Views
You can always find unaswered question in science but that gives no weight to religion
22/06/2015 01:52:25 PM
- 506 Views
...I'm confused, are you claiming that no real fossils have been found?
07/06/2015 02:41:12 PM
- 543 Views
And they prove what, exactly?
07/06/2015 11:24:43 PM
- 645 Views
Er, well yeah, that's the point- Scientific knowledge keeps growing and challenging itself
08/06/2015 02:58:26 PM
- 589 Views
It's not at all the same.
09/06/2015 02:53:06 PM
- 549 Views
Dude, you're monologuing like a supervillain and going off on insane tangents.
09/06/2015 03:27:37 PM
- 646 Views
In fact, fossils are not even necessary sometimes -- we can see it over the course of generations
08/06/2015 09:06:23 PM
- 566 Views
That's not evolution, idiot.
09/06/2015 02:31:27 PM
- 555 Views
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely
10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM
- 532 Views
They're not changing. Same species, same characteristics. We're just finding different proportions.
13/06/2015 05:35:09 PM
- 465 Views
"It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 03:36:42 AM
- 471 Views
Re: "It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 02:23:36 PM
- 510 Views
I would not have expected to see you adhere to a scientist position
07/06/2015 03:06:11 AM
- 598 Views
I am not; I am criticizing the people who apply it inconsistently
07/06/2015 11:14:05 PM
- 639 Views
Perhaps she does not believe in hell
08/06/2015 12:55:50 PM
- 458 Views
You are confusing science and scientism
08/06/2015 10:15:57 PM
- 521 Views
For what it is worth, I have encountered many people who satisfy those stated "scientism" criteria
15/06/2015 03:37:36 AM
- 484 Views
can republicans stop their posturing about adhering to morality?
08/06/2015 09:17:16 PM
- 559 Views
My own homosexual inclinations would not constitute hypocrisy in opposing deviant behavior
09/06/2015 02:14:56 PM
- 583 Views
at least you're finally open about your homosexual attraction to the former Bruce Jenner...
10/06/2015 12:05:10 AM
- 640 Views
"… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith… speaking lies in hypocrisy…"
15/06/2015 03:36:08 AM
- 599 Views
Good luck with that; (at least) two beloved long time RAFOlk are post-medically transgendered
15/06/2015 03:34:33 AM
- 432 Views
I find this entire discussion absolutely hilarious.
15/06/2015 04:19:31 PM
- 470 Views
well I am sucb a died in the wool liberal I just cant help myself
15/06/2015 06:25:57 PM
- 432 Views
...what? Attacking points is pretty much what debate IS.
16/06/2015 04:29:05 AM
- 495 Views
No...
17/06/2015 08:00:57 PM
- 478 Views
OK?
18/06/2015 04:03:32 AM
- 513 Views
Oh, I'm sorry.
18/06/2015 09:05:42 PM
- 579 Views
A thesis delayed till the SECOND paragraph is, at best, misplaced
20/06/2015 09:37:36 AM
- 555 Views
Bah, damn you for good points!
21/06/2015 09:33:49 PM
- 570 Views
The really fun part is when grammatical gender doesn't match the sex even for humans.
22/06/2015 10:30:33 PM
- 450 Views
"Mädchen" was my initial reference, changed because I think Spanish more accessible to Americans
24/06/2015 04:42:37 AM
- 511 Views
Re: Oh, I'm sorry.
20/06/2015 04:44:24 PM
- 632 Views
You're missing my whole issue with labeling.
21/06/2015 09:32:36 PM
- 563 Views
Had this post been the thread-starter it would have drawn far fewer complaints
24/06/2015 04:41:06 AM
- 814 Views
The sheer brazenness of the "calling bigots 'bigots' is offensive" "defense" continually amazes me
20/06/2015 04:03:46 AM
- 764 Views
This might be a complete non-sequitur, but...
21/06/2015 10:38:19 PM
- 451 Views