View original post
View original post
But the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old and humans have only existed for a tiny fraction of that time. We can see clear stages where creatures become less and similar to us as we go back in time. We can look at DNA and see a commonality with creatures who we believe spilt from us more recently. There is no missing link and we will never have the complete picture but the evidence of change over time and the appearance and disappearance of species over time is solid. There is no other valid explanation and the Hebrew creation myth matches the evidence about as well the Greek myth.
But the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old and humans have only existed for a tiny fraction of that time. We can see clear stages where creatures become less and similar to us as we go back in time. We can look at DNA and see a commonality with creatures who we believe spilt from us more recently. There is no missing link and we will never have the complete picture but the evidence of change over time and the appearance and disappearance of species over time is solid. There is no other valid explanation and the Hebrew creation myth matches the evidence about as well the Greek myth.
Physical resemblances do not prove relationships. That might be how Ned Stark obtains adultery convictions, but you need something better to support a non-disprovable hypothesis being taught as absolute, unquestioned fact, while alternatives are banned, whether "creation science" or panspermia (whose advocates, include Sir Fred Hoyle, whose credentials are vastly superior to those of Charles Darwin) or anything else.
I personally think that the weight of evidence favors evolution over creation, however I do think there is an issue with science generally being perceived as absolute, unquestioned fact when generally they are scientific theories that tend to change over time as more data is received.
There are many fields where the scientific view has shifted over time, as more evidence or data becomes available.
Thus scientific theories, while generally robust and based on empirical research, are generally the best held explanation / theory for why something is occurring, and are useful for modelling (such as Newton's 2nd law of physics - it isn't correct but is accurate enough for speeds not nearing the speed of light).
Given how these theories are developed, I think it is reasonable that they are the ones taught in schools, however I do think it is reasonable to at least mention that there are other theories out there, with brief outlines. I don't think they need to be discussed in as much detail, but at least put out there so people can look into it further if they wish.
Can liberals all stop their posturing about adhering to science?
- 05/06/2015 12:04:13 AM
1302 Views
It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man
- 05/06/2015 02:23:34 PM
707 Views
Some people feel like they are women, though born as men. So they take steps to live
- 05/06/2015 04:47:14 PM
703 Views
The issue is science, and you respond with ...feelings? The point called, and it misses you too.
- 05/06/2015 09:31:09 PM
721 Views
Are you seriously claiming your post is motivated by science?
- 05/06/2015 10:39:01 PM
583 Views
No, by hypocrites citing science as a trump card when it suits them & ignoring it on other issues
- 06/06/2015 12:33:53 AM
704 Views
If you want to accuse liberals of ignoring science there so many better examples
- 09/06/2015 04:35:58 PM
704 Views
gender issues aside the evidence of evolution is undeniable to the extreme
- 05/06/2015 08:37:37 PM
589 Views
Well then why do scientists feel the need to make up their own fake evidence?
- 05/06/2015 09:16:40 PM
621 Views
The specifics and our understanding always changes
- 05/06/2015 09:50:39 PM
630 Views
"A better fit" doesn't sound much like testable hypotheses and observable data
- 06/06/2015 12:38:49 AM
766 Views
Science and absolute, unquestioned fact...
- 06/06/2015 11:16:10 AM
643 Views
The theory is refined that is all
- 08/06/2015 07:11:40 PM
625 Views
Refined is probably a better word for it (though some can be overturned)
- 09/06/2015 08:47:22 AM
613 Views
We can find Naederthal DNA in modern humans
- 08/06/2015 07:01:01 PM
568 Views
We share 1/3 of the DNA of flowers. Where are those in our ancestral tree?
- 09/06/2015 02:20:46 PM
594 Views
Americas (Christian?!) "accepted religious standards" can and have been changed to vindicate robbers
- 15/06/2015 03:37:12 AM
583 Views
So? My point is that liberals would not allow you to teach that in a public school
- 15/06/2015 01:43:43 PM
516 Views
Liberals consistently teach that in schools, despite conservatives calling it “revisionist history”
- 17/06/2015 10:00:48 AM
629 Views
The problem with the "there can not spontanous life" argument is
- 15/06/2015 02:29:06 PM
566 Views
"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
- 17/06/2015 10:02:00 AM
586 Views
will since omnipotent beings are ut side the realm of the possible we can eliminate that
- 17/06/2015 05:45:36 PM
647 Views
Who says omnipotent beings are outside the realm of possibility?
- 20/06/2015 03:59:44 AM
700 Views
You can always find unaswered question in science but that gives no weight to religion
- 22/06/2015 01:52:25 PM
563 Views
...I'm confused, are you claiming that no real fossils have been found?
- 07/06/2015 02:41:12 PM
598 Views
And they prove what, exactly?
- 07/06/2015 11:24:43 PM
709 Views
Er, well yeah, that's the point- Scientific knowledge keeps growing and challenging itself
- 08/06/2015 02:58:26 PM
650 Views
It's not at all the same.
- 09/06/2015 02:53:06 PM
611 Views
Dude, you're monologuing like a supervillain and going off on insane tangents.
- 09/06/2015 03:27:37 PM
711 Views
In fact, fossils are not even necessary sometimes -- we can see it over the course of generations
- 08/06/2015 09:06:23 PM
634 Views
That's not evolution, idiot.
- 09/06/2015 02:31:27 PM
585 Views
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely
- 10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM
586 Views
They're not changing. Same species, same characteristics. We're just finding different proportions.
- 13/06/2015 05:35:09 PM
534 Views
"It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
- 15/06/2015 03:36:42 AM
530 Views
Re: "It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
- 15/06/2015 02:23:36 PM
592 Views
I would not have expected to see you adhere to a scientist position
- 07/06/2015 03:06:11 AM
664 Views
I am not; I am criticizing the people who apply it inconsistently
- 07/06/2015 11:14:05 PM
694 Views
You are confusing science and scientism
- 08/06/2015 10:15:57 PM
583 Views
For what it is worth, I have encountered many people who satisfy those stated "scientism" criteria
- 15/06/2015 03:37:36 AM
546 Views
can republicans stop their posturing about adhering to morality?
- 08/06/2015 09:17:16 PM
608 Views
My own homosexual inclinations would not constitute hypocrisy in opposing deviant behavior
- 09/06/2015 02:14:56 PM
616 Views
at least you're finally open about your homosexual attraction to the former Bruce Jenner... 
- 10/06/2015 12:05:10 AM
712 Views
- 10/06/2015 12:05:10 AM
712 Views
"… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith… speaking lies in hypocrisy…"
- 15/06/2015 03:36:08 AM
671 Views
”
Good luck with that; (at least) two beloved long time RAFOlk are post-medically transgendered
- 15/06/2015 03:34:33 AM
484 Views
I find this entire discussion absolutely hilarious.
- 15/06/2015 04:19:31 PM
492 Views
well I am sucb a died in the wool liberal I just cant help myself
- 15/06/2015 06:25:57 PM
493 Views
...what? Attacking points is pretty much what debate IS.
- 16/06/2015 04:29:05 AM
556 Views
No...
- 17/06/2015 08:00:57 PM
542 Views
OK?
- 18/06/2015 04:03:32 AM
567 Views
Oh, I'm sorry.
- 18/06/2015 09:05:42 PM
635 Views
A thesis delayed till the SECOND paragraph is, at best, misplaced
- 20/06/2015 09:37:36 AM
620 Views
Bah, damn you for good points!
- 21/06/2015 09:33:49 PM
632 Views
The really fun part is when grammatical gender doesn't match the sex even for humans.
- 22/06/2015 10:30:33 PM
504 Views
"Mädchen" was my initial reference, changed because I think Spanish more accessible to Americans 
- 24/06/2015 04:42:37 AM
588 Views
- 24/06/2015 04:42:37 AM
588 Views
Re: Oh, I'm sorry.
- 20/06/2015 04:44:24 PM
697 Views
You're missing my whole issue with labeling.
- 21/06/2015 09:32:36 PM
633 Views
Had this post been the thread-starter it would have drawn far fewer complaints
- 24/06/2015 04:41:06 AM
888 Views
The sheer brazenness of the "calling bigots 'bigots' is offensive" "defense" continually amazes me
- 20/06/2015 04:03:46 AM
820 Views
This might be a complete non-sequitur, but...
- 21/06/2015 10:38:19 PM
514 Views