Active Users:1166 Time:22/11/2024 08:45:24 PM
Your posts are valuable; each time I read one, I realize I'd forgotten how dumb you are. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/03/2015 11:44:26 PM

apparently sex used to only be between committed, consensual adults who only did it in the bedroom and never ever strayed from their little perfectly manicured gardens.

It was a metaphor, you colossal idiot.
all the while forgetting "the world's oldest profession" did not happen in a vacuum, and the push for equality over the last 50 years means that a lot of these things are necessarily going to have to be revisited from time to time in order to provide the equality we are supposed to be living under.

good job working in an infanticide reference as well. obviously women's only role in society is to serve as baby-making machines who only exist to serve the whims of her true master, her husband. or father, as the case may be... as long as she's making babies (with her husband of course) and doing what her husband tells her is right, she's a real woman in your view. she should not be trusted to have her own best interests at heart, someone has to tell her what her worth is and how she should think. and once she's incapable of having more children, obviously she now has no value and it's time to go find another woman who can fulfill the baby-making role.

Lovely strawman argument there. Only a sexist liberal moron can look at a criticism of casual sex, which takes one person of each gender, and see some sort of anti-feminist statement. Are you claiming that women are naturally sluts, on whom restraint and self-discipline are a greater burden? You honestly have no reading comprehension skills at all, do you? You ascertain the topic of an article or a composition and your opinion of the piece reverts to your default feelings on the issue, regardless of whether or not the two are remotely connected.

My response was IN OPPOSITION to the original article, which defended the practice of using alcohol to induce partners into casual sex. I criticized the attempts to parse fine points of acceptable behavior in a sphere of activity that I find to be completely unacceptable.

The original article was saying "They are ruining the fun of taking advantage of loopholes in the rules for acceptable sexual conduct, by punishing men for having what they thought was a casual, mutually desired sexual encounter."

My reply was "Tough shit, asshole. Get to know her and commit to her, and really come to understand her as a person, so there won't be any mixed signals, you'll initiate a sexual relationship when both of you are in a proper frame of mind, and you won't be prosecuted."

But because I am espousing a position on sexual relationships that was established and formally approved of prior to 1960, your brain shuts off, stops reading, and spews a bunch of tired feminist talking points, that have created a world where women are casually raped because they had too much to drink. At least with traditional morality, there was a universal understanding that this state of affairs was to be avoided, rather than nit-picked to death about whose right to irresponsible gratification trumped whose.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Drunk Sex - 03/03/2015 03:32:30 PM 1219 Views
Shouldn't the manner of getting hammered factor in ? - 03/03/2015 05:31:48 PM 765 Views
It's worth reading the BBC and Telegraph articles your article links to. - 03/03/2015 06:23:32 PM 890 Views
I am more interested in the trend in general and not this specific law - 03/03/2015 07:10:20 PM 708 Views
A lot of those studies are based on adjusting the goalposts for rape - 04/03/2015 12:58:06 AM 558 Views
[citation needed] - 04/03/2015 10:13:38 PM 531 Views
They'd better enforce it equally *NM* - 03/03/2015 06:28:38 PM 266 Views
Just like hate crime is enforced equally? *NM* - 03/03/2015 07:10:45 PM 278 Views
Exactly. I don't have high hopes *NM* - 03/03/2015 09:10:40 PM 369 Views
it's pretty simple actually: don't take advantage of someone who isn't in their right state of mind - 03/03/2015 11:21:54 PM 500 Views
But they are making it complicated - 04/03/2015 12:12:27 AM 546 Views
no, it's actually turning the burden of proof onto the accused as it should be - 04/03/2015 10:09:59 PM 697 Views
Re: no, it's actually turning the burden of proof onto the accused as it should be - 04/03/2015 11:29:00 PM 571 Views
Yes - 05/03/2015 09:21:41 PM 741 Views
Why are women having sex the only people immune from bad decisions while intoxicate? - 04/03/2015 03:59:31 PM 568 Views
who are you to decide what is rape and what is not? - 04/03/2015 09:55:35 PM 614 Views
The only rational one the in this conversation by all appearances. - 05/03/2015 02:39:56 AM 597 Views
So you're guilty until proven innocent?? - 06/03/2015 01:52:47 AM 796 Views
They get around all that proof stuff by keeping it out of the courts - 09/03/2015 04:34:21 PM 523 Views
And that shit is happening ALL THE TIME. - 09/03/2015 04:57:53 PM 617 Views
i think you may be pushing your personal bias on the author. - 06/03/2015 06:42:15 PM 716 Views
When you break the big laws, you don't get freedom or even anarchy, you get the small laws. - 04/03/2015 12:46:41 AM 732 Views
wow, what a quaint world you pine for - 04/03/2015 10:23:43 PM 576 Views
Your posts are valuable; each time I read one, I realize I'd forgotten how dumb you are. - 04/03/2015 11:44:26 PM 688 Views

Reply to Message