Active Users:1183 Time:22/11/2024 10:31:32 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Reducing pollution doesn't exactly mean cutting CO2..... Anonymous2000 Send a noteboard - 18/09/2014 04:09:58 AM

The pollution in China is due to soot and sulfur. I believe you can reduce these without reducing CO2 by the same amount.


View original post
View original postI mean if the whole word has agreed then we should expect to see changes happen right away. How much is China going to decrease their output by this decade?


View original postNot because of global warming but because the smog is killing them, and doing more to antagonize their population than anything else.


View original postThat said, with China's growth numbers, progress for them would really just be to come close to stabilizing CO2 emissions, decreasing them is asking a lot.

Reply to message
The "settled science" of climate change continues to unravel..... Anonymous2000 - 16/09/2014 07:00:16 PM 1107 Views
What utter rubbish ironclad - 16/09/2014 08:54:22 PM 775 Views
By the time my daughter is 50'ish..... Anonymous2000 - 17/09/2014 04:08:35 AM 745 Views
tell the people of norfolk, VA that climate change isn't happening moondog - 18/09/2014 12:12:45 AM 918 Views
So if we are the only deniers I expect to see rapid and dramatic decrease in the carbon? random thoughts - 17/09/2014 08:39:30 PM 781 Views
The Chinese will take action - they have not much choice anymore. Legolas - 17/09/2014 09:51:10 PM 764 Views
Reducing pollution doesn't exactly mean cutting CO2..... Anonymous2000 - 18/09/2014 04:09:58 AM 727 Views
don't consufe glaobal warming with air pollution random thoughts - 18/09/2014 03:45:53 PM 740 Views
I don't know anyone that would call me right wing callandor1000 - 27/09/2014 05:15:21 AM 955 Views
I mean, ignoring everything else, I always thought it boiled down to an easily-answered question beetnemesis - 17/09/2014 04:45:02 PM 769 Views
If by "unravel" you mean that it's more complex than it seemed at first, then yes. Legolas - 17/09/2014 08:04:24 PM 713 Views
The probelm is the models suck and they are beingt over sold random thoughts - 17/09/2014 08:43:56 PM 719 Views
They're flawed, sure, but they're the best we have. Legolas - 17/09/2014 09:46:34 PM 781 Views
It isn't "any flaw in model" they are almost all wrong and most but a huge margin random thoughts - 18/09/2014 03:50:49 PM 726 Views
the problem is that people like yourself refuse to believe that science works moondog - 17/09/2014 11:57:11 PM 796 Views
that was 90% inaccurate random thoughts - 18/09/2014 03:39:35 PM 736 Views
"More complex" is a coward's way of saying we were wrong..... Anonymous2000 - 18/09/2014 04:22:00 AM 731 Views
If by coward you mean scientist, then sure. Legolas - 18/09/2014 06:10:30 AM 805 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes