Active Users:896 Time:22/11/2024 02:02:21 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM

The term "holiday let" doesn't refer to the entire length of the Summer break. It just means a place where people stay when they're on holiday, for a few days or whatever. They don't sign leases.

She does state on the website that she's prepared to do longer-term lets (which doesn't bother us because, as you say, they sign a lease and have to provide references), but what she wants to use it for is short stays of a couple of days.

It's already reserved for 5 days over Hogmanay/New Year.

*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
This message last edited by Rebekah on 20/11/2013 at 04:43:00 PM
Reply to message
What would you do? Rebekah - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2201 Views
Hrm. Sareitha Sedai - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 888 Views
Re: Hrm. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 907 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 956 Views
Also doesn't she need to apply for change of use to holiday let from residential? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:12:59 PM 906 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 907 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. Legolas - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 981 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 969 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so Wibble - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 996 Views
Yes. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 944 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. LiterateDog - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1007 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. temeraire - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1012 Views
Quite. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 859 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* @my - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 633 Views
Tough. nossy - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 924 Views
Re: Tough. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 865 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. Palatine - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 926 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 836 Views
Re: I hear you. Palatine - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 994 Views
Re: I hear you. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 908 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? random thoughts - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 841 Views
Not precisely. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 789 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? Tom - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 787 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM* Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM 402 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM 416 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM 429 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM 437 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM 859 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland Tom - 19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM 807 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business? LiterateDog - 19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM 936 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM 832 Views
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. Rebekah - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM 886 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" Tim - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM 1024 Views
I am a fan of British English usually, but not in the case of "flat". And yes, I'd go for interdict Tom - 20/11/2013 02:27:19 PM 829 Views
Another lovely piece of Language peculiar to Scots Law... majander - 27/11/2013 04:34:23 PM 956 Views
Though I always thought interdict was the Pope excommunicating an entire nation. *NM* Tom - 20/11/2013 02:30:23 PM 443 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. Tim - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1152 Views
Yes, restrictive covenants. And those things can be unreasonable and still legal. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:29:45 PM 841 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera Sports_Gambler - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 860 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 496 Views
I can't see much you can do really... Sports_Gambler - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 882 Views
Does the building have a factor? majander - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 830 Views
Yes indeed. Rebekah - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 806 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes