Active Users:371 Time:03/04/2025 05:44:41 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Quite. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM

View original postI'm of two minds about this. I generally support lax land use regulation unless something is clearly a hazard or nuisance. But, I also wouldn't want to be in your situation. It's tricky. If the law allows for it, block it. If not, then you might have to at the very least monitor Miss E very closely and at the most extreme, follow Meg's advice and move.

I just think it's very thoughtless not to consult your neighbours when there's a shared garden. We only found out about this because of a nosey neighbour.
View original postI'm not very helpful, I know. But I do feel bad for you!

Heh.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
What would you do? Rebekah - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2289 Views
Hrm. Sareitha Sedai - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 966 Views
Re: Hrm. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 995 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 1036 Views
Also doesn't she need to apply for change of use to holiday let from residential? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:12:59 PM 980 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 988 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. Legolas - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 1056 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 1049 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so Wibble - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 1075 Views
Yes. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 1027 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. LiterateDog - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1086 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. temeraire - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1082 Views
Quite. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 930 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* @my - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 671 Views
Tough. nossy - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 1013 Views
Re: Tough. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 946 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. Palatine - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 1007 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 915 Views
Re: I hear you. Palatine - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 1084 Views
Re: I hear you. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 979 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? random thoughts - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 924 Views
Not precisely. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 869 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? Tom - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 869 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM* Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM 436 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM 453 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM 464 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM 480 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM 937 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland Tom - 19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM 886 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business? LiterateDog - 19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM 1012 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM 913 Views
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. Rebekah - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM 964 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" Tim - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM 1109 Views
I am a fan of British English usually, but not in the case of "flat". And yes, I'd go for interdict Tom - 20/11/2013 02:27:19 PM 912 Views
Another lovely piece of Language peculiar to Scots Law... majander - 27/11/2013 04:34:23 PM 1038 Views
Though I always thought interdict was the Pope excommunicating an entire nation. *NM* Tom - 20/11/2013 02:30:23 PM 481 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. Tim - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1229 Views
Yes, restrictive covenants. And those things can be unreasonable and still legal. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:29:45 PM 921 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera Sports_Gambler - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 914 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 528 Views
I can't see much you can do really... Sports_Gambler - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 960 Views
Does the building have a factor? majander - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 908 Views
Yes indeed. Rebekah - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 879 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes