Active Users:819 Time:22/11/2024 01:51:02 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Quite. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM

View original postI'm of two minds about this. I generally support lax land use regulation unless something is clearly a hazard or nuisance. But, I also wouldn't want to be in your situation. It's tricky. If the law allows for it, block it. If not, then you might have to at the very least monitor Miss E very closely and at the most extreme, follow Meg's advice and move.

I just think it's very thoughtless not to consult your neighbours when there's a shared garden. We only found out about this because of a nosey neighbour.
View original postI'm not very helpful, I know. But I do feel bad for you!

Heh.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
What would you do? Rebekah - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2200 Views
Hrm. Sareitha Sedai - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 888 Views
Re: Hrm. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 907 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 956 Views
Also doesn't she need to apply for change of use to holiday let from residential? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:12:59 PM 906 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 906 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. Legolas - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 981 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 969 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so Wibble - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 995 Views
Yes. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 944 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. LiterateDog - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1007 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. temeraire - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1012 Views
Quite. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 859 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* @my - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 633 Views
Tough. nossy - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 924 Views
Re: Tough. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 865 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. Palatine - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 926 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 836 Views
Re: I hear you. Palatine - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 994 Views
Re: I hear you. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 907 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? random thoughts - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 841 Views
Not precisely. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 789 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? Tom - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 787 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM* Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM 402 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM 416 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM 429 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM 437 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM 859 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland Tom - 19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM 807 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business? LiterateDog - 19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM 936 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM 832 Views
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. Rebekah - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM 885 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" Tim - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM 1024 Views
I am a fan of British English usually, but not in the case of "flat". And yes, I'd go for interdict Tom - 20/11/2013 02:27:19 PM 829 Views
Another lovely piece of Language peculiar to Scots Law... majander - 27/11/2013 04:34:23 PM 956 Views
Though I always thought interdict was the Pope excommunicating an entire nation. *NM* Tom - 20/11/2013 02:30:23 PM 443 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. Tim - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1151 Views
Yes, restrictive covenants. And those things can be unreasonable and still legal. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:29:45 PM 841 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera Sports_Gambler - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 860 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 496 Views
I can't see much you can do really... Sports_Gambler - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 882 Views
Does the building have a factor? majander - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 830 Views
Yes indeed. Rebekah - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 806 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes