Active Users:383 Time:27/04/2025 06:59:25 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Quite. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM

View original postI'm of two minds about this. I generally support lax land use regulation unless something is clearly a hazard or nuisance. But, I also wouldn't want to be in your situation. It's tricky. If the law allows for it, block it. If not, then you might have to at the very least monitor Miss E very closely and at the most extreme, follow Meg's advice and move.

I just think it's very thoughtless not to consult your neighbours when there's a shared garden. We only found out about this because of a nosey neighbour.
View original postI'm not very helpful, I know. But I do feel bad for you!

Heh.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
What would you do? Rebekah - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2303 Views
Hrm. Sareitha Sedai - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 974 Views
Re: Hrm. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 1005 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 1048 Views
Also doesn't she need to apply for change of use to holiday let from residential? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:12:59 PM 988 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 1002 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. Legolas - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 1065 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 1059 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so Wibble - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 1085 Views
Yes. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 1039 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. LiterateDog - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1096 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. temeraire - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1091 Views
Quite. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 941 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* @my - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 677 Views
Tough. nossy - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 1023 Views
Re: Tough. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 956 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. Palatine - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 1018 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 926 Views
Re: I hear you. Palatine - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 1095 Views
Re: I hear you. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 989 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? random thoughts - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 934 Views
Not precisely. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 879 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? Tom - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 881 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM* Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM 441 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM 457 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM 468 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM 484 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM 946 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland Tom - 19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM 897 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business? LiterateDog - 19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM 1023 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM 923 Views
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. Rebekah - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM 974 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" Tim - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM 1118 Views
I am a fan of British English usually, but not in the case of "flat". And yes, I'd go for interdict Tom - 20/11/2013 02:27:19 PM 921 Views
Another lovely piece of Language peculiar to Scots Law... majander - 27/11/2013 04:34:23 PM 1048 Views
Though I always thought interdict was the Pope excommunicating an entire nation. *NM* Tom - 20/11/2013 02:30:23 PM 485 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. Tim - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1240 Views
Yes, restrictive covenants. And those things can be unreasonable and still legal. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:29:45 PM 930 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera Sports_Gambler - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 925 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 532 Views
I can't see much you can do really... Sports_Gambler - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 971 Views
Does the building have a factor? majander - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 919 Views
Yes indeed. Rebekah - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 889 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes