Active Users:781 Time:22/12/2024 01:26:31 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Hrm. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM

View original postDo other people in the building have kids? Presumably the new owner is within her rights to sublet it in this way?

Yes, there are some other families with children.

And we're not sure about whether she's allowed to do this. The title deeds state that it must be used for residential, and people are not allowed to run businesses from their flats, but whether holiday letting runs foul of either of these is about interpretation, I think. And the council can't do anything about it; we'd have to take a private law case against her and we're not sure it's worth that.


View original postI suppose I would make sure I supervised E in the garden, and if people who rent the flat seem sketchy or it gets to be terribly inconvenient, I would sell and move. I wouldn't be happy about it, but I am not sure what else you could do to protect her, which seems like the main concern.

It is, yes. We want to move in a couple of years anyway, but don't think we could afford to do it sooner.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
What would you do? Rebekah - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2215 Views
Hrm. Sareitha Sedai - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 899 Views
Re: Hrm. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 922 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 970 Views
Also doesn't she need to apply for change of use to holiday let from residential? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:12:59 PM 916 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 921 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. Legolas - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 996 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 980 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so Wibble - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 1010 Views
Yes. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 961 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. LiterateDog - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1024 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. temeraire - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1029 Views
Quite. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 872 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* @my - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 640 Views
Tough. nossy - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 942 Views
Re: Tough. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 880 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. Palatine - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 942 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 846 Views
Re: I hear you. Palatine - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 1012 Views
Re: I hear you. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 918 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? random thoughts - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 858 Views
Not precisely. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 801 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? Tom - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 806 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM* Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM 408 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM 423 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM 437 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM 444 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM 871 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland Tom - 19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM 821 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business? LiterateDog - 19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM 949 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM 846 Views
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. Rebekah - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM 898 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" Tim - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM 1036 Views
I am a fan of British English usually, but not in the case of "flat". And yes, I'd go for interdict Tom - 20/11/2013 02:27:19 PM 844 Views
Another lovely piece of Language peculiar to Scots Law... majander - 27/11/2013 04:34:23 PM 973 Views
Though I always thought interdict was the Pope excommunicating an entire nation. *NM* Tom - 20/11/2013 02:30:23 PM 451 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. Tim - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1166 Views
Yes, restrictive covenants. And those things can be unreasonable and still legal. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:29:45 PM 855 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera Sports_Gambler - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 875 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 504 Views
I can't see much you can do really... Sports_Gambler - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 900 Views
Does the building have a factor? majander - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 843 Views
Yes indeed. Rebekah - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 822 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes