Talking points
"What the presient is getting criticized for now and always is being a Democrat. While I agree all presidents have constitutional authority as commander-in-chief to order combat without Congressional consent, Republicans calling for impeachment if any Democrat (and only a Democrat) does so disagree."

Because it is not true.

Clinton was impeached for the felony crime of perjury, not for any of the hundred or so military missions that he legally ordered. He was criticized for several of them (bombing an aspirin factory, which inspired the movie Wag the Dog is an example). Or for how he had the military missions prosecuted, Kosovo, Somalia & Yugoslavia (why can't we just stay out of other people's civil wars) among them; especially when he chose to subordinate US Military men to UN commanders and (and their INCREDIBLY stupid ROEs).

You have not once seen me speak out in favor of impeaching Obama, and you won't until he has actually committed a criminal act. Leaving people to hang like he did in Libya is not criminal, just cowardly. Maybe he committed something criminal in the aftermath to cover up his moral cowardice (isn't that how it usually works? The cover-up is worse than the offense), but if so we have not seen it yet. Same for the actions at the IRS (lots of smoke, but still no fire, even with what has been reported about his brother). Even Fast & Furious was not criminal (though the lies afterwards might have been), just stupid. That statement describes most of Obama's scandals. There have been a few fools in Congress that have openly mentioned the possibility, IF evidence is found of criminal acts, but none have actually called for it, except for media personalities and morons, just like with the "Arrest Bush and Cheney for war crimes" morons on the left.

"Syria is the latest variation on a tired theme: First Obama should be impeached because he will not act, then because he will and now because seeking the very congressional approval the GOP demanded he seek. Seriously, wtf do they want from him? Even doing just as they command earns only continual public denunciation."

Nope. Nobody, that I recall, called for his impeachment for not acting, Concern was voiced that he was going to ignore the war Powers resolution (Like he did with Libya) and not consult with Congress prior to beginning non-urgent offensive military actions. However, he could not be impeached for it, and everyone with 1/5th a brain knows it. The War Powers resolution is not enforceable, and exists as pure PR.

I think that the President should seek a declaration of war from Congress before imitating non-defensive military action (I see attacking them before they can attack me, if I know they are likely to do so, as defensive though). Examples of actions that i think should have required an actual Declaration of War would be Korea, Viet Nam, Grenada, Gulf 1 & 2, Somalia, Kosovo, Libya, etc. Basically every one of the BS we have used a our military on since WW2 (which was our last declared war). If the President had to go before the Congress and get a declaration, he might not flex those military muscles so often, and if Congress had to surrender as much authority to the Executive branch as it does in a time of declared war, they might just quit playing politics, and try to end the fucker instead. HOWEVER, the Constitution gives him the authority to attack ANYONE (except the US people not in active rebellion)he choses for whatever reason (even if it is just that his morning coffe is cold so he wanted more fresh beans from Columbia).

As for your continued complaint about how Congress won't let Obama do whatever he wants to do, again I can only say GOOD. That is exactly why I voted for my Congressman. I completely disagree with virtually every single policy decision this administration has made. Compared to him I think Carter was an 'effin GENIUS, Ford was Machiavelli, hell, even Millard Filmore would have been preferable to this clown. I used to be able to at least say he could give a good speech but lately he hasn't even been able to do that. He is a complete incompetent, surrounded by morons & crooks, and that is my "generous" opinion of him. I WANT him blocked by the House, that is why I voted for the representative I did, he promised to do just that. If he ever stops blocking Obama's agenda, I will vote for someone who will block it. I want the house to prevent every single stupid thing he tries to do, until he stops doing stupid things; so far he has not done so.

Clear enough?