Active Users:724 Time:24/11/2024 03:54:41 AM
Well, glad we can agree on something. Joel Send a noteboard - 03/09/2013 02:00:21 AM

View original post
View original postNow, I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one; Assad is not likely to Pearl Harbor us even if he wants to (though one could argue his dad did via Hezbollah in '83,) and we ARE likely to have plenty of time and warning before he gains that ability. The point is we live in a republic rather than democracy precisely because the majority is not always right (something the German electorate underscored differently shortly before 1940.) Just because the majority do/not want something does not mean the country should/not do it. American majorities have supported slavery, prohibition and more than a few ill-advised military campaigns. That did not make any of them moral or wise, and many things that were both did not suddenly cease to be either when public support vanished.

Unfortunately it takes leadership, to buck the popular opinion; and there has been VERY little of that in evidence from anyone in Washington for a very long time.

That is arguably the worst consequence of Clintonian government by focus groups and polls. One of the big advantages of our system over purely democratic parliamentary ones is that after each election the victors, particularly the president, has several years in which to make policy secure in the knowledge even the most unpopular ones will not provoke a vote of no confidence toppling the government tomorrow. The stark terror of political consequences for taking any firm position without first verifying its strong enduring support has eroded that advantage over the past two decades.

That was one of the few things Bush got right: He was often wrong for the right reasons. Sometimes we must pin our ears back and do what we think best regardless of how loud the criticism, and you are right that is the defining quality of leadership. Getting out in front of the stampede is not leadership; any moron can do that. Leadership requires directing the oft recalcitrant herd with "profiles in courage."

Obama talks a good game on that, as on so many things, but even when he says things like he is willing to be a one term president for universal healthcare or willing to stake re-election on trimming $4 trillion from the deficit with tax hikes and spending cuts, he always blinks first. He inexplicably still has not realized that has won him exactly ZERO of the friends he expected on the right, while alienating many of his supporters on the left and leaving those in the middle wondering why anyone should support an administration incapable of DOING anything.

Republicans say we must get rid of activist government but, IMHO, the real problem is we already DID (except for sacrosanct corporate subsidies, of course. )

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So... a limited strike on Syria ? - 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM 1098 Views
I would have supported action over a year ago, but not now. - 29/08/2013 05:29:52 PM 585 Views
Rand Paul is a Leftist now? - 30/08/2013 01:13:17 AM 712 Views
Killing people to not look bad! What a guy! - 29/08/2013 05:44:59 PM 657 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ? - 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM 638 Views
I think you're wrong. - 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM 618 Views
I think the real question is "Just how crazy is Iran?" - 30/08/2013 01:48:49 PM 714 Views
You misunderstood me - 30/08/2013 07:13:41 PM 577 Views
I don't think the Iranians are stupid enough to strike - 01/09/2013 03:04:24 AM 538 Views
I don't really care - 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM 619 Views
I am not a fan of symbolic bombing - 30/08/2013 12:52:01 PM 624 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress - 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM 576 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap - 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM 552 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now? - 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM 764 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point - 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM 700 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either. - 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM 704 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it. - 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM 582 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first - 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM 521 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington. - 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM 610 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940 - 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM 562 Views
Hall has frozen over... you are correct. - 02/09/2013 11:22:13 PM 613 Views
Well, glad we can agree on something. - 03/09/2013 02:00:21 AM 574 Views
That comparison is not valid. - 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM 586 Views
I have to say, I am opposed to a strike against Assad. - 05/09/2013 10:46:04 AM 570 Views

Reply to Message