Active Users:625 Time:24/11/2024 04:36:19 AM
You misunderstood me DomA Send a noteboard - 30/08/2013 07:13:41 PM

View original post
I think there will be a strike. Failing to strike at this point is sadly worse than not striking. It was Obama's stupidity that got us into this, but Russia isn't going to start a nuclear war over Syria, and short of that the US is willing to act alone.

I just wish that both Assad and the rebels could lose.



i think there will be a strike, but the apparent divisions on the public place are part of a diplomatic game, and when the strike happens Russia's answer will pretty much have been ascertained.

Russia will want not to completely lose face and any credibility it has left as a major power in the area by doing nothing. i'm sure Putin doesn't plan anything drastic; it will be diplomatic, and perhaps moving a few ships. i'd be more worried about iran striking back by proxy, but it seems Hezbollah won't do much more than a token reply.


The US is willing to act alone.

i think it's willing to with political support and no strong opposition from its allies, which at the moment Obama pretty much gets, with perhaps more active involvement from France.

And yeah, there seem to be no good option for Syria anymore and i too would wish both Assad and the rebels could just lose. i don't think a warning strike will accomplish much beside saving face and buying time.

Reply to message
So... a limited strike on Syria ? - 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM 1098 Views
I would have supported action over a year ago, but not now. - 29/08/2013 05:29:52 PM 586 Views
Rand Paul is a Leftist now? - 30/08/2013 01:13:17 AM 712 Views
Killing people to not look bad! What a guy! - 29/08/2013 05:44:59 PM 657 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ? - 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM 638 Views
I think you're wrong. - 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM 619 Views
I think the real question is "Just how crazy is Iran?" - 30/08/2013 01:48:49 PM 716 Views
You misunderstood me - 30/08/2013 07:13:41 PM 578 Views
I don't think the Iranians are stupid enough to strike - 01/09/2013 03:04:24 AM 540 Views
I don't really care - 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM 619 Views
I am not a fan of symbolic bombing - 30/08/2013 12:52:01 PM 624 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress - 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM 576 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap - 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM 553 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now? - 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM 766 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point - 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM 700 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either. - 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM 704 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it. - 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM 584 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first - 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM 521 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington. - 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM 610 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940 - 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM 564 Views
Hall has frozen over... you are correct. - 02/09/2013 11:22:13 PM 613 Views
Well, glad we can agree on something. - 03/09/2013 02:00:21 AM 575 Views
That comparison is not valid. - 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM 586 Views
I have to say, I am opposed to a strike against Assad. - 05/09/2013 10:46:04 AM 570 Views

Reply to Message